% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Kraljevi:1029134,
author = {Kraljević, Nevena and Langner, Robert and Küppers,
Vincent and Raimondo, Federico and Patil, Kaustubh R. and
Eickhoff, Simon B. and Müller, Veronika I.},
title = {{N}etwork and state specificity in connectivity‐based
predictions of individual behavior},
journal = {Human brain mapping},
volume = {45},
number = {8},
issn = {1065-9471},
address = {New York, NY},
publisher = {Wiley-Liss},
reportid = {FZJ-2024-04990},
pages = {e26753},
year = {2024},
abstract = {Predicting individual behavior from brain functional
connectivity (FC) patterns can contribute to our
understanding of human brain functioning. This may apply in
particular if predictions are based on features derived from
circumscribed, a priori defined functional networks, which
improves interpretability. Furthermore, some evidence
suggests that task-based FC data may yield more successful
predictions of behavior than resting-state FC data. Here, we
comprehensively examined to what extent the correspondence
of functional network priors and task states with behavioral
target domains influences the predictability of individual
performance in cognitive, social, and affective tasks. To
this end, we used data from the Human Connectome Project for
large-scale out-of-sample predictions of individual
abilities in working memory (WM), theory-of-mind cognition
(SOCIAL), and emotion processing (EMO) from FC of
corresponding and non-corresponding states
(WM/SOCIAL/EMO/resting-state) and networks
(WM/SOCIAL/EMO/whole-brain connectome). Using root mean
squared error and coefficient of determination to evaluate
model fit revealed that predictive performance was rather
poor overall. Predictions from whole-brain FC were slightly
better than those from FC in task-specific networks, and a
slight benefit of predictions based on FC from task versus
resting state was observed for performance in the WM domain.
Beyond that, we did not find any significant effects of a
correspondence of network, task state, and performance
domains. Together, these results suggest that multivariate
FC patterns during both task and resting states contain
rather little information on individual performance levels,
calling for a reconsideration of how the brain mediates
individual differences in mental abilities.Keywords:
brain‐based prediction; brain–behavior relationships;
fMRI; functional connectivity; interindividual differences;
machine learning.},
cin = {INM-7},
ddc = {610},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)INM-7-20090406},
pnm = {5251 - Multilevel Brain Organization and Variability
(POF4-525)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5251},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {38864353},
UT = {WOS:001243999500001},
doi = {10.1002/hbm.26753},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/1029134},
}