% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Jones:1029367,
author = {Jones, Robert O.},
title = {{P}hase change memory materials: {W}hy are alloys of {G}e,
{S}b, and {T}e the materials of choice?},
journal = {Solid state sciences},
volume = {152},
issn = {1293-2558},
address = {Amsterdam [u.a.]},
publisher = {Elsevier},
reportid = {FZJ-2024-05076},
pages = {107524 -},
year = {2024},
abstract = {Rewritable optical storage is dominated by alloys of a
small number of elements, particularly Ge, Sb, and Te, and
Ge/Sb/Te alloys in the composition range
(GeTe)1−x(Sb2Te3)x (0 ≤ x ≤ 1) have been the materials
of choice: all have metastable rock salt structures that
change little over decades at archival temperatures, and all
contain vacancies (cavities). The special status arises from
the close similarity of the valence orbitals of Ge, Sb, and
Te, which arises from the irregular changes in atomic
orbitals and properties as the atomic number increases
(“secondary periodicity”). The instability of cubic
(metallic) Bi to a (semimetallic) rhombohedral structure (H.
Jones, 1934) can be adapted to Ge/Sb/Te alloys and explains
the crucial metastable (rock salt) structures of these
compounds. Vacancies almost always occur next to Te atoms,
which form one sublattice of the rock salt structure.},
cin = {PGI-1 / JARA-HPC},
ddc = {550},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)PGI-1-20110106 / $I:(DE-82)080012_20140620$},
pnm = {5211 - Topological Matter (POF4-521)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5211},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
UT = {WOS:001219745300001},
doi = {10.1016/j.solidstatesciences.2024.107524},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/1029367},
}