Home > Publications database > When visual attention is divided in the flash-lag effect > print

001     1030755
005     20250512115730.0
024 7 _ |a 10.1167/jov.24.9.17
|2 doi
024 7 _ |a 10.34734/FZJ-2024-05458
|2 datacite_doi
024 7 _ |a 39325434
|2 pmid
024 7 _ |a WOS:001459134200016
|2 WOS
037 _ _ |a FZJ-2024-05458
082 _ _ |a 610
100 1 _ |a Yook, Jane
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 0
|e First author
245 _ _ |a When visual attention is divided in the flash-lag effect
260 _ _ |a Rockville, Md.
|c 2024
|b ARVO
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|b journal
|m journal
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|s 1734079522_7858
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
520 _ _ |a The flash-lag effect (FLE) occurs when a flash's position seems to be delayed relative to a continuously moving object, even though both are physically aligned. Although several studies have demonstrated that reduced attention increases FLE magnitude, the precise mechanism underlying these attention-dependent effects remains elusive. In this study, we investigated the influence of visual attention on the FLE by manipulating the level of attention allocated to multiple stimuli moving simultaneously in different locations. Participants were cued to either focus on one moving stimulus or split their attention among two, three, or four moving stimuli presented in different quadrants. We measured trial-wise FLE to explore potential changes in the magnitude of perceived displacement and its trial-to-trial variability under different attention conditions. Our results reveal that FLE magnitudes were significantly greater when attention was divided among multiple stimuli compared with when attention was focused on a single stimulus, suggesting that divided attention considerably augments the perceptual illusion. However, FLE variability, measured as the coefficient of variation, did not differ between conditions, indicating that the consistency of the illusion is unaffected by divided attention. We discuss the interpretations and implications of our findings in the context of widely accepted explanations of the FLE within a dynamic environment.
536 _ _ |a 5251 - Multilevel Brain Organization and Variability (POF4-525)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5251
|c POF4-525
|f POF IV
|x 0
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to CrossRef
700 1 _ |a Hogendoorn, Hinze
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 1
700 1 _ |a Fink, Gereon R.
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)131720
|b 2
|u fzj
700 1 _ |a Vossel, Simone
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)131745
|b 3
|e Corresponding author
|u fzj
700 1 _ |a Weidner, Ralph
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)131747
|b 4
|u fzj
773 _ _ |a 10.1167/jov.24.9.17
|g Vol. 24, no. 9, p. 17 -
|0 PERI:(DE-600)2106064-2
|n 9
|p 17 -
|t Journal of vision
|v 24
|y 2024
|x 1534-7362
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/1030755/files/INV_24_SEP_005774.pdf
856 4 _ |x icon
|u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/1030755/files/INV_24_SEP_005774.gif?subformat=icon
856 4 _ |x icon-1440
|u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/1030755/files/INV_24_SEP_005774.jpg?subformat=icon-1440
856 4 _ |x icon-180
|u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/1030755/files/INV_24_SEP_005774.jpg?subformat=icon-180
856 4 _ |x icon-640
|u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/1030755/files/INV_24_SEP_005774.jpg?subformat=icon-640
856 4 _ |y OpenAccess
|u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/1030755/files/PDF.pdf
856 4 _ |y OpenAccess
|u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/1030755/files/i1534-7362-24-9-17_1727095620.75533.pdf
909 C O |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:1030755
|p openaire
|p open_access
|p OpenAPC
|p driver
|p VDB
|p openCost
|p dnbdelivery
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 2
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)131720
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 3
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)131745
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 4
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)131747
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|b Key Technologies
|l Natural, Artificial and Cognitive Information Processing
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-520
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-525
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF4
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-500
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|v Decoding Brain Organization and Dysfunction
|9 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5251
|x 0
914 1 _ |y 2024
915 p c |a APC keys set
|0 PC:(DE-HGF)0000
|2 APC
915 p c |a DOAJ Journal
|0 PC:(DE-HGF)0003
|2 APC
915 _ _ |a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs CC BY-NC-ND 3.0
|0 LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBYNCND3
|2 HGFVOC
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0160
|2 StatID
|b Essential Science Indicators
|d 2023-10-25
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0501
|2 StatID
|b DOAJ Seal
|d 2021-07-28T17:03:06Z
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0500
|2 StatID
|b DOAJ
|d 2021-07-28T17:03:06Z
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0113
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index Expanded
|d 2023-10-25
915 _ _ |a Fees
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0700
|2 StatID
|d 2023-10-25
915 _ _ |a OpenAccess
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0510
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a Peer Review
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0030
|2 StatID
|b DOAJ : Peer review
|d 2021-07-28T17:03:06Z
915 _ _ |a Article Processing Charges
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0561
|2 StatID
|d 2023-10-25
915 _ _ |a JCR
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100
|2 StatID
|b J VISION : 2022
|d 2024-12-19
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200
|2 StatID
|b SCOPUS
|d 2024-12-19
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300
|2 StatID
|b Medline
|d 2024-12-19
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199
|2 StatID
|b Clarivate Analytics Master Journal List
|d 2024-12-19
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1110
|2 StatID
|b Current Contents - Clinical Medicine
|d 2024-12-19
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150
|2 StatID
|b Web of Science Core Collection
|d 2024-12-19
915 _ _ |a IF < 5
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)9900
|2 StatID
|d 2024-12-19
920 _ _ |l yes
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)INM-3-20090406
|k INM-3
|l Kognitive Neurowissenschaften
|x 0
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)INM-3-20090406
980 _ _ |a APC
980 1 _ |a APC
980 1 _ |a FullTexts

LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21