001030923 001__ 1030923
001030923 005__ 20250512115736.0
001030923 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.1177/17470161241272760
001030923 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a1747-0161
001030923 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a2047-6094
001030923 0247_ $$2datacite_doi$$a10.34734/FZJ-2024-05516
001030923 0247_ $$2WOS$$aWOS:001299423100001
001030923 037__ $$aFZJ-2024-05516
001030923 082__ $$a610
001030923 1001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)138795$$aHeinrichs, Jan-Hendrik$$b0$$eCorresponding author
001030923 245__ $$aAgent regret and the moral responsibility for the misuse of research results
001030923 260__ $$aLondon [u.a.]$$bSage Publ.$$c2024
001030923 3367_ $$2DRIVER$$aarticle
001030923 3367_ $$2DataCite$$aOutput Types/Journal article
001030923 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)16$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aJournal Article$$bjournal$$mjournal$$s1745393102_24519
001030923 3367_ $$2BibTeX$$aARTICLE
001030923 3367_ $$2ORCID$$aJOURNAL_ARTICLE
001030923 3367_ $$00$$2EndNote$$aJournal Article
001030923 500__ $$aThe project has been funded by the German Ministry für Education and Research (BMBF) Project DUMFE (Dual Use and Misuse of Research Results), 01GP2187
001030923 520__ $$aAn increasing number of research fields must expect that their projects will be classified as susceptible to misuse or otherwise security relevant, even if the reasons or criteria for this classification have not yet been uniformly developed. Research institutions will commonly distribute the obligation to predict and prevent misuse across multiple members and structures including ethics committees. However, cases of misuse occur even in spite of these precautions, raising the question of the type and distribution of responsibility for the resulting harm. This question becomes even more pressing if research ethics committees in their decisions ask researchers to provide a misuse- specific risk assessment or risk mitigation plan and thereby shift back a part of their responsibility on the researchers. While this kind of requirement may be considered as unsatisfactory by researchers, members of research ethics committees or boards and third-party funders, will argue that it fulfils two important functions. On the one hand, it makes use of the best available source for misuse risk-assessment available to most committees; on the other hand, it guarantees that the researchers at least try to take responsibility. If researchers, committee members and others involved discharge their obligation to predict and mitigate misuse risks with due diligence, any backward-looking responsibility they retain is to show agent regret for the results of their work having been misused.
001030923 536__ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5255$$a5255 - Neuroethics and Ethics of Information (POF4-525)$$cPOF4-525$$fPOF IV$$x0
001030923 588__ $$aDataset connected to CrossRef, Journals: juser.fz-juelich.de
001030923 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)196715$$aAslan, Serap Ergin$$b1$$ufzj
001030923 773__ $$0PERI:(DE-600)2663626-8$$a10.1177/17470161241272760$$gp. 17470161241272760$$n2$$p 245-266$$tResearch ethics$$v21$$x1747-0161$$y2024
001030923 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/1030923/files/heinrichs-ergin-aslan-2024-agent-regret-and-the-moral-responsibility-for-the-misuse-of-research-results.pdf$$yOpenAccess
001030923 8767_ $$d2025-03-05$$eAPC$$jPublish and Read
001030923 909CO $$ooai:juser.fz-juelich.de:1030923$$pdnbdelivery$$popenCost$$pVDB$$pdriver$$pOpenAPC$$popen_access$$popenaire
001030923 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)138795$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b0$$kFZJ
001030923 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)196715$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b1$$kFZJ
001030923 9131_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF4-525$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF4-520$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF4-500$$3G:(DE-HGF)POF4$$4G:(DE-HGF)POF$$9G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5255$$aDE-HGF$$bKey Technologies$$lNatural, Artificial and Cognitive Information Processing$$vDecoding Brain Organization and Dysfunction$$x0
001030923 915pc $$0PC:(DE-HGF)0000$$2APC$$aAPC keys set
001030923 915pc $$0PC:(DE-HGF)0001$$2APC$$aLocal Funding
001030923 915pc $$0PC:(DE-HGF)0002$$2APC$$aDFG OA Publikationskosten
001030923 915pc $$0PC:(DE-HGF)0003$$2APC$$aDOAJ Journal
001030923 915pc $$0PC:(DE-HGF)0111$$2APC$$aGAC: Sage 2021
001030923 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0200$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bSCOPUS$$d2023-08-25
001030923 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0600$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bEbsco Academic Search$$d2023-08-25
001030923 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0100$$2StatID$$aJCR$$bRES ETHICS-UK : 2022$$d2023-08-25
001030923 915__ $$0LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBYNC4$$2HGFVOC$$aCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial CC BY-NC 4.0
001030923 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0501$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bDOAJ Seal$$d2021-01-15T16:51:16Z
001030923 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0500$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bDOAJ$$d2021-01-15T16:51:16Z
001030923 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)9900$$2StatID$$aIF < 5$$d2023-08-25
001030923 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0150$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bWeb of Science Core Collection$$d2023-08-25
001030923 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0112$$2StatID$$aWoS$$bEmerging Sources Citation Index$$d2023-08-25
001030923 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0510$$2StatID$$aOpenAccess
001030923 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0030$$2StatID$$aPeer Review$$bASC$$d2023-08-25
001030923 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0430$$2StatID$$aNational-Konsortium$$d2023-08-25$$wger
001030923 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0300$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bMedline$$d2023-08-25
001030923 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0199$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bClarivate Analytics Master Journal List$$d2023-08-25
001030923 9201_ $$0I:(DE-Juel1)INM-7-20090406$$kINM-7$$lGehirn & Verhalten$$x0
001030923 980__ $$ajournal
001030923 980__ $$aVDB
001030923 980__ $$aUNRESTRICTED
001030923 980__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)INM-7-20090406
001030923 980__ $$aAPC
001030923 9801_ $$aAPC
001030923 9801_ $$aFullTexts