Hauptseite > Publikationsdatenbank > Agent regret and the moral responsibility for the misuse of research results > print

001     1030923
005     20250512115736.0
024 7 _ |a 10.1177/17470161241272760
|2 doi
024 7 _ |a 1747-0161
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 2047-6094
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 10.34734/FZJ-2024-05516
|2 datacite_doi
024 7 _ |a WOS:001299423100001
|2 WOS
037 _ _ |a FZJ-2024-05516
082 _ _ |a 610
100 1 _ |a Heinrichs, Jan-Hendrik
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)138795
|b 0
|e Corresponding author
245 _ _ |a Agent regret and the moral responsibility for the misuse of research results
260 _ _ |a London [u.a.]
|c 2024
|b Sage Publ.
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|b journal
|m journal
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|s 1745393102_24519
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
500 _ _ |a The project has been funded by the German Ministry für Education and Research (BMBF) Project DUMFE (Dual Use and Misuse of Research Results), 01GP2187
520 _ _ |a An increasing number of research fields must expect that their projects will be classified as susceptible to misuse or otherwise security relevant, even if the reasons or criteria for this classification have not yet been uniformly developed. Research institutions will commonly distribute the obligation to predict and prevent misuse across multiple members and structures including ethics committees. However, cases of misuse occur even in spite of these precautions, raising the question of the type and distribution of responsibility for the resulting harm. This question becomes even more pressing if research ethics committees in their decisions ask researchers to provide a misuse- specific risk assessment or risk mitigation plan and thereby shift back a part of their responsibility on the researchers. While this kind of requirement may be considered as unsatisfactory by researchers, members of research ethics committees or boards and third-party funders, will argue that it fulfils two important functions. On the one hand, it makes use of the best available source for misuse risk-assessment available to most committees; on the other hand, it guarantees that the researchers at least try to take responsibility. If researchers, committee members and others involved discharge their obligation to predict and mitigate misuse risks with due diligence, any backward-looking responsibility they retain is to show agent regret for the results of their work having been misused.
536 _ _ |a 5255 - Neuroethics and Ethics of Information (POF4-525)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5255
|c POF4-525
|f POF IV
|x 0
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to CrossRef, Journals: juser.fz-juelich.de
700 1 _ |a Aslan, Serap Ergin
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)196715
|b 1
|u fzj
773 _ _ |a 10.1177/17470161241272760
|g p. 17470161241272760
|0 PERI:(DE-600)2663626-8
|n 2
|p 245-266
|t Research ethics
|v 21
|y 2024
|x 1747-0161
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/1030923/files/heinrichs-ergin-aslan-2024-agent-regret-and-the-moral-responsibility-for-the-misuse-of-research-results.pdf
|y OpenAccess
909 C O |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:1030923
|p openaire
|p open_access
|p OpenAPC
|p driver
|p VDB
|p openCost
|p dnbdelivery
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 0
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)138795
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 1
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)196715
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|b Key Technologies
|l Natural, Artificial and Cognitive Information Processing
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-520
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-525
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF4
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-500
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|v Decoding Brain Organization and Dysfunction
|9 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5255
|x 0
915 p c |a APC keys set
|0 PC:(DE-HGF)0000
|2 APC
915 p c |a Local Funding
|0 PC:(DE-HGF)0001
|2 APC
915 p c |a DFG OA Publikationskosten
|0 PC:(DE-HGF)0002
|2 APC
915 p c |a DOAJ Journal
|0 PC:(DE-HGF)0003
|2 APC
915 p c |a GAC: Sage 2021
|0 PC:(DE-HGF)0111
|2 APC
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200
|2 StatID
|b SCOPUS
|d 2023-08-25
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0600
|2 StatID
|b Ebsco Academic Search
|d 2023-08-25
915 _ _ |a JCR
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100
|2 StatID
|b RES ETHICS-UK : 2022
|d 2023-08-25
915 _ _ |a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial CC BY-NC 4.0
|0 LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBYNC4
|2 HGFVOC
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0501
|2 StatID
|b DOAJ Seal
|d 2021-01-15T16:51:16Z
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0500
|2 StatID
|b DOAJ
|d 2021-01-15T16:51:16Z
915 _ _ |a IF < 5
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)9900
|2 StatID
|d 2023-08-25
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150
|2 StatID
|b Web of Science Core Collection
|d 2023-08-25
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0112
|2 StatID
|b Emerging Sources Citation Index
|d 2023-08-25
915 _ _ |a OpenAccess
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0510
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a Peer Review
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0030
|2 StatID
|b ASC
|d 2023-08-25
915 _ _ |a National-Konsortium
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0430
|2 StatID
|d 2023-08-25
|w ger
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300
|2 StatID
|b Medline
|d 2023-08-25
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199
|2 StatID
|b Clarivate Analytics Master Journal List
|d 2023-08-25
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)INM-7-20090406
|k INM-7
|l Gehirn & Verhalten
|x 0
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)INM-7-20090406
980 _ _ |a APC
980 1 _ |a APC
980 1 _ |a FullTexts

LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21