001     1030924
005     20250912110159.0
024 7 _ |a 10.1162/imag_a_00251
|2 doi
024 7 _ |a 10.34734/FZJ-2024-05517
|2 datacite_doi
024 7 _ |a 40800257
|2 pmid
024 7 _ |a WOS:001531565300003
|2 WOS
037 _ _ |a FZJ-2024-05517
082 _ _ |a 050
100 1 _ |a Wulan, Naren
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 0
245 _ _ |a Translating phenotypic prediction models from big to small anatomical MRI data using meta-matching
260 _ _ |a Cambridge, MA
|c 2024
|b MIT Press
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|b journal
|m journal
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|s 1737100324_7619
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
520 _ _ |a Individualized phenotypic prediction based on structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is an important goal in neuroscience. Prediction performance increases with larger samples, but small-scale datasets with fewer than 200 participants are often unavoidable. We have previously proposed a “meta-matching” framework to translate models trained from large datasets to improve the prediction of new unseen phenotypes in small collection efforts. Meta-matching exploits correlations between phenotypes, yielding large improvement over classical machine learning when applied to prediction models using resting-state functional connectivity as input features. Here, we adapt the two best performing meta-matching variants (“meta-matching finetune” and “meta-matching stacking”) from our previous study to work with T1-weighted MRI data by changing the base neural network architecture to a 3D convolution neural network. We compare the two meta-matching variants with elastic net and classical transfer learning using the UK Biobank (N = 36,461), the Human Connectome Project Young Adults (HCP-YA) dataset (N = 1,017), and the HCP-Aging dataset (N = 656). We find that meta-matching outperforms elastic net and classical transfer learning by a large margin, both when translating models within the same dataset and when translating models across datasets with different MRI scanners, acquisition protocols, and demographics. For example, when translating a UK Biobank model to 100 HCP-YA participants, meta-matching finetune yielded a 136% improvement in variance explained over transfer learning, with an average absolute gain of 2.6% (minimum = –0.9%, maximum = 17.6%) across 35 phenotypes. Overall, our results highlight the versatility of the meta-matching framework.
536 _ _ |a 5254 - Neuroscientific Data Analytics and AI (POF4-525)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5254
|c POF4-525
|f POF IV
|x 0
536 _ _ |a 5252 - Brain Dysfunction and Plasticity (POF4-525)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5252
|c POF4-525
|f POF IV
|x 1
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to CrossRef, Journals: juser.fz-juelich.de
700 1 _ |a An, Lijun
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 1
700 1 _ |a Zhang, Chen
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 2
700 1 _ |a Kong, Ru
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 3
700 1 _ |a Chen, Pansheng
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 4
700 1 _ |a Bzdok, Danilo
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 5
700 1 _ |a Eickhoff, Simon B.
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)131678
|b 6
|u fzj
700 1 _ |a Holmes, Avram J.
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 7
700 1 _ |a Yeo, B. T. Thomas
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 8
|e Corresponding author
773 _ _ |a 10.1162/imag_a_00251
|g Vol. 2, p. 1 - 21
|0 PERI:(DE-600)3167925-0
|p 1 - 21
|t Imaging neuroscience
|v 2
|y 2024
|x 2837-6056
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/1030924/files/imag_a_00251.pdf
|y OpenAccess
909 C O |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:1030924
|p openaire
|p open_access
|p VDB
|p driver
|p dnbdelivery
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 6
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)131678
910 1 _ |a HHU Düsseldorf
|0 I:(DE-HGF)0
|b 6
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)131678
910 1 _ |a Department of Medicine, Human Potential Translational Research Programme & Institute for Digital Medicine (WisDM), Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore *Corresponding Author: B.T. Thomas Yeo (yeoyeo02+INau@gmail.com)
|0 I:(DE-HGF)0
|b 8
|6 P:(DE-HGF)0
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|b Key Technologies
|l Natural, Artificial and Cognitive Information Processing
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-520
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-525
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF4
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-500
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|v Decoding Brain Organization and Dysfunction
|9 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5254
|x 0
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|b Key Technologies
|l Natural, Artificial and Cognitive Information Processing
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-520
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-525
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF4
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-500
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|v Decoding Brain Organization and Dysfunction
|9 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5252
|x 1
914 1 _ |y 2024
915 _ _ |a OpenAccess
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0510
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a Creative Commons Attribution CC BY 4.0
|0 LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBY4
|2 HGFVOC
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300
|2 StatID
|b Medline
|d 2025-01-02
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0501
|2 StatID
|b DOAJ Seal
|d 2024-09-26T09:40:26Z
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0500
|2 StatID
|b DOAJ
|d 2024-09-26T09:40:26Z
915 _ _ |a Peer Review
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0030
|2 StatID
|b DOAJ : Anonymous peer review
|d 2024-09-26T09:40:26Z
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)INM-7-20090406
|k INM-7
|l Gehirn & Verhalten
|x 0
980 1 _ |a FullTexts
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)INM-7-20090406


LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21