001030926 001__ 1030926
001030926 005__ 20250912110155.0
001030926 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.1162/imag_a_00277
001030926 0247_ $$2datacite_doi$$a10.34734/FZJ-2024-05519
001030926 0247_ $$2pmid$$a40800307
001030926 0247_ $$2WOS$$aWOS:001529784400016
001030926 037__ $$aFZJ-2024-05519
001030926 082__ $$a050
001030926 1001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aAmbrase, Aiste$$b0$$eCorresponding author
001030926 245__ $$aDistinct neural networks of task engagement and choice response in moral, risky, and ambiguous decision-making: An ALE meta-analysis
001030926 260__ $$aCambridge, MA$$bMIT Press$$c2024
001030926 3367_ $$2DRIVER$$aarticle
001030926 3367_ $$2DataCite$$aOutput Types/Journal article
001030926 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)16$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aJournal Article$$bjournal$$mjournal$$s1737100544_4957
001030926 3367_ $$2BibTeX$$aARTICLE
001030926 3367_ $$2ORCID$$aJOURNAL_ARTICLE
001030926 3367_ $$00$$2EndNote$$aJournal Article
001030926 500__ $$aThis research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors. B.D. and A.A. are supported by the DFG (DE2319, IRTG 2804). V.I.M. and J.A.C. are supported by the National Institute of Mental Health (R01-MH074457) and the Helmholtz Portfolio Theme “Supercomputing and Modelling for the Human Brain.”
001030926 520__ $$aMoral, risky, and ambiguous decision-making are likely to be characterized by common and distinct cognitive processes and thus show partly overlapping neural correlates. Previously, two different analysis approaches have been used to assess the neural correlates in all three domains: (a) comparing general engagement in an experimental task versus a control task (task engagement) or (b) comparing actual opposite choices made during the experimental task (choice response). Several coordinate-based activation likelihood estimation meta-analyses were performed to delineate consistent activations across experiments of the two analysis categories and the different decision-making domains. Our results show that task engagement and choice response capture different aspects of salience network involvement and reward-related striatum processing during decision-making. When assessing domains separately, we discovered that moral cues are processed in a multi-modal social cognition network, while risk and ambiguity require engagement of the salience and the frontoparietal attention networks. This is the first meta-analysis to disentangle the two analysis approaches yielding new insight into common and distinct neural correlates of different kinds of decision-making.
001030926 536__ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5251$$a5251 - Multilevel Brain Organization and Variability (POF4-525)$$cPOF4-525$$fPOF IV$$x0
001030926 536__ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5253$$a5253 - Neuroimaging (POF4-525)$$cPOF4-525$$fPOF IV$$x1
001030926 588__ $$aDataset connected to CrossRef, Journals: juser.fz-juelich.de
001030926 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)131699$$aMüller, Veronika I.$$b1$$ufzj
001030926 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)172024$$aCamilleri, Julia$$b2$$ufzj
001030926 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aWong, Hong Yu$$b3
001030926 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aDerntl, Birgit$$b4
001030926 773__ $$0PERI:(DE-600)3167925-0$$a10.1162/imag_a_00277$$gVol. 2, p. 1 - 35$$p1 - 35$$tImaging neuroscience$$v2$$x2837-6056$$y2024
001030926 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/1030926/files/imag_a_00277.pdf$$yOpenAccess
001030926 909CO $$ooai:juser.fz-juelich.de:1030926$$pdnbdelivery$$pdriver$$pVDB$$popen_access$$popenaire
001030926 9101_ $$0I:(DE-HGF)0$$6P:(DE-HGF)0$$a  Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Tübingen Centre for Mental Health, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany †Corresponding Author: Aiste Ambrase (aiste.ambrase@gmail.com; aiste.ambrase@med.uni-tuebingen.de)$$b0
001030926 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)131699$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b1$$kFZJ
001030926 9101_ $$0I:(DE-HGF)0$$6P:(DE-Juel1)131699$$a HHU Düsseldorf$$b1
001030926 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)172024$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b2$$kFZJ
001030926 9131_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF4-525$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF4-520$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF4-500$$3G:(DE-HGF)POF4$$4G:(DE-HGF)POF$$9G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5251$$aDE-HGF$$bKey Technologies$$lNatural, Artificial and Cognitive Information Processing$$vDecoding Brain Organization and Dysfunction$$x0
001030926 9131_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF4-525$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF4-520$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF4-500$$3G:(DE-HGF)POF4$$4G:(DE-HGF)POF$$9G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5253$$aDE-HGF$$bKey Technologies$$lNatural, Artificial and Cognitive Information Processing$$vDecoding Brain Organization and Dysfunction$$x1
001030926 9141_ $$y2024
001030926 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0510$$2StatID$$aOpenAccess
001030926 915__ $$0LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBY4$$2HGFVOC$$aCreative Commons Attribution CC BY 4.0
001030926 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0300$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bMedline$$d2025-01-02
001030926 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0501$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bDOAJ Seal$$d2024-09-26T09:40:26Z
001030926 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0500$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bDOAJ$$d2024-09-26T09:40:26Z
001030926 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0030$$2StatID$$aPeer Review$$bDOAJ : Anonymous peer review$$d2024-09-26T09:40:26Z
001030926 9201_ $$0I:(DE-Juel1)INM-7-20090406$$kINM-7$$lGehirn & Verhalten$$x0
001030926 980__ $$ajournal
001030926 980__ $$aVDB
001030926 980__ $$aUNRESTRICTED
001030926 980__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)INM-7-20090406
001030926 9801_ $$aFullTexts