% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{Ambrase:1030926,
      author       = {Ambrase, Aiste and Müller, Veronika I. and Camilleri,
                      Julia and Wong, Hong Yu and Derntl, Birgit},
      title        = {{D}istinct neural networks of task engagement and choice
                      response in moral, risky, and ambiguous decision-making:
                      {A}n {ALE} meta-analysis},
      journal      = {Imaging neuroscience},
      volume       = {2},
      issn         = {2837-6056},
      address      = {Cambridge, MA},
      publisher    = {MIT Press},
      reportid     = {FZJ-2024-05519},
      pages        = {1 - 35},
      year         = {2024},
      note         = {This research did not receive any specific grant from
                      funding agencies in the public, commercial, or
                      not-for-profit sectors. B.D. and A.A. are supported by the
                      DFG (DE2319, IRTG 2804). V.I.M. and J.A.C. are supported by
                      the National Institute of Mental Health (R01-MH074457) and
                      the Helmholtz Portfolio Theme “Supercomputing and
                      Modelling for the Human Brain.”},
      abstract     = {Moral, risky, and ambiguous decision-making are likely to
                      be characterized by common and distinct cognitive processes
                      and thus show partly overlapping neural correlates.
                      Previously, two different analysis approaches have been used
                      to assess the neural correlates in all three domains: (a)
                      comparing general engagement in an experimental task versus
                      a control task (task engagement) or (b) comparing actual
                      opposite choices made during the experimental task (choice
                      response). Several coordinate-based activation likelihood
                      estimation meta-analyses were performed to delineate
                      consistent activations across experiments of the two
                      analysis categories and the different decision-making
                      domains. Our results show that task engagement and choice
                      response capture different aspects of salience network
                      involvement and reward-related striatum processing during
                      decision-making. When assessing domains separately, we
                      discovered that moral cues are processed in a multi-modal
                      social cognition network, while risk and ambiguity require
                      engagement of the salience and the frontoparietal attention
                      networks. This is the first meta-analysis to disentangle the
                      two analysis approaches yielding new insight into common and
                      distinct neural correlates of different kinds of
                      decision-making.},
      cin          = {INM-7},
      ddc          = {050},
      cid          = {I:(DE-Juel1)INM-7-20090406},
      pnm          = {5251 - Multilevel Brain Organization and Variability
                      (POF4-525) / 5253 - Neuroimaging (POF4-525)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5251 / G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5253},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      pubmed       = {40800307},
      UT           = {WOS:001529784400016},
      doi          = {10.1162/imag_a_00277},
      url          = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/1030926},
}