Hauptseite > Publikationsdatenbank > Distinct neural networks of task engagement and choice response in moral, risky, and ambiguous decision-making: An ALE meta-analysis > print |
001 | 1030926 | ||
005 | 20250912110155.0 | ||
024 | 7 | _ | |a 10.1162/imag_a_00277 |2 doi |
024 | 7 | _ | |a 10.34734/FZJ-2024-05519 |2 datacite_doi |
024 | 7 | _ | |a 40800307 |2 pmid |
024 | 7 | _ | |a WOS:001529784400016 |2 WOS |
037 | _ | _ | |a FZJ-2024-05519 |
082 | _ | _ | |a 050 |
100 | 1 | _ | |a Ambrase, Aiste |0 P:(DE-HGF)0 |b 0 |e Corresponding author |
245 | _ | _ | |a Distinct neural networks of task engagement and choice response in moral, risky, and ambiguous decision-making: An ALE meta-analysis |
260 | _ | _ | |a Cambridge, MA |c 2024 |b MIT Press |
336 | 7 | _ | |a article |2 DRIVER |
336 | 7 | _ | |a Output Types/Journal article |2 DataCite |
336 | 7 | _ | |a Journal Article |b journal |m journal |0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16 |s 1737100544_4957 |2 PUB:(DE-HGF) |
336 | 7 | _ | |a ARTICLE |2 BibTeX |
336 | 7 | _ | |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE |2 ORCID |
336 | 7 | _ | |a Journal Article |0 0 |2 EndNote |
500 | _ | _ | |a This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors. B.D. and A.A. are supported by the DFG (DE2319, IRTG 2804). V.I.M. and J.A.C. are supported by the National Institute of Mental Health (R01-MH074457) and the Helmholtz Portfolio Theme “Supercomputing and Modelling for the Human Brain.” |
520 | _ | _ | |a Moral, risky, and ambiguous decision-making are likely to be characterized by common and distinct cognitive processes and thus show partly overlapping neural correlates. Previously, two different analysis approaches have been used to assess the neural correlates in all three domains: (a) comparing general engagement in an experimental task versus a control task (task engagement) or (b) comparing actual opposite choices made during the experimental task (choice response). Several coordinate-based activation likelihood estimation meta-analyses were performed to delineate consistent activations across experiments of the two analysis categories and the different decision-making domains. Our results show that task engagement and choice response capture different aspects of salience network involvement and reward-related striatum processing during decision-making. When assessing domains separately, we discovered that moral cues are processed in a multi-modal social cognition network, while risk and ambiguity require engagement of the salience and the frontoparietal attention networks. This is the first meta-analysis to disentangle the two analysis approaches yielding new insight into common and distinct neural correlates of different kinds of decision-making. |
536 | _ | _ | |a 5251 - Multilevel Brain Organization and Variability (POF4-525) |0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5251 |c POF4-525 |f POF IV |x 0 |
536 | _ | _ | |a 5253 - Neuroimaging (POF4-525) |0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5253 |c POF4-525 |f POF IV |x 1 |
588 | _ | _ | |a Dataset connected to CrossRef, Journals: juser.fz-juelich.de |
700 | 1 | _ | |a Müller, Veronika I. |0 P:(DE-Juel1)131699 |b 1 |u fzj |
700 | 1 | _ | |a Camilleri, Julia |0 P:(DE-Juel1)172024 |b 2 |u fzj |
700 | 1 | _ | |a Wong, Hong Yu |0 P:(DE-HGF)0 |b 3 |
700 | 1 | _ | |a Derntl, Birgit |0 P:(DE-HGF)0 |b 4 |
773 | _ | _ | |a 10.1162/imag_a_00277 |g Vol. 2, p. 1 - 35 |0 PERI:(DE-600)3167925-0 |p 1 - 35 |t Imaging neuroscience |v 2 |y 2024 |x 2837-6056 |
856 | 4 | _ | |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/1030926/files/imag_a_00277.pdf |y OpenAccess |
909 | C | O | |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:1030926 |p openaire |p open_access |p VDB |p driver |p dnbdelivery |
910 | 1 | _ | |a Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Tübingen Centre for Mental Health, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany †Corresponding Author: Aiste Ambrase (aiste.ambrase@gmail.com; aiste.ambrase@med.uni-tuebingen.de) |0 I:(DE-HGF)0 |b 0 |6 P:(DE-HGF)0 |
910 | 1 | _ | |a Forschungszentrum Jülich |0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8 |k FZJ |b 1 |6 P:(DE-Juel1)131699 |
910 | 1 | _ | |a HHU Düsseldorf |0 I:(DE-HGF)0 |b 1 |6 P:(DE-Juel1)131699 |
910 | 1 | _ | |a Forschungszentrum Jülich |0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8 |k FZJ |b 2 |6 P:(DE-Juel1)172024 |
913 | 1 | _ | |a DE-HGF |b Key Technologies |l Natural, Artificial and Cognitive Information Processing |1 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-520 |0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-525 |3 G:(DE-HGF)POF4 |2 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-500 |4 G:(DE-HGF)POF |v Decoding Brain Organization and Dysfunction |9 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5251 |x 0 |
913 | 1 | _ | |a DE-HGF |b Key Technologies |l Natural, Artificial and Cognitive Information Processing |1 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-520 |0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-525 |3 G:(DE-HGF)POF4 |2 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-500 |4 G:(DE-HGF)POF |v Decoding Brain Organization and Dysfunction |9 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5253 |x 1 |
914 | 1 | _ | |y 2024 |
915 | _ | _ | |a OpenAccess |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0510 |2 StatID |
915 | _ | _ | |a Creative Commons Attribution CC BY 4.0 |0 LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBY4 |2 HGFVOC |
915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300 |2 StatID |b Medline |d 2025-01-02 |
915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0501 |2 StatID |b DOAJ Seal |d 2024-09-26T09:40:26Z |
915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0500 |2 StatID |b DOAJ |d 2024-09-26T09:40:26Z |
915 | _ | _ | |a Peer Review |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0030 |2 StatID |b DOAJ : Anonymous peer review |d 2024-09-26T09:40:26Z |
920 | 1 | _ | |0 I:(DE-Juel1)INM-7-20090406 |k INM-7 |l Gehirn & Verhalten |x 0 |
980 | _ | _ | |a journal |
980 | _ | _ | |a VDB |
980 | _ | _ | |a UNRESTRICTED |
980 | _ | _ | |a I:(DE-Juel1)INM-7-20090406 |
980 | 1 | _ | |a FullTexts |
Library | Collection | CLSMajor | CLSMinor | Language | Author |
---|