% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@INBOOK{Heinrichs:1030930,
author = {Heinrichs, Jan-Hendrik},
editor = {Beck, Birgit and Friedrich, Orsolya},
title = {{N}arrows, {D}etours, and {D}ead {E}nds—{H}ow {C}ognitive
{S}caffolds {C}an {C}onstrain the {M}ind},
volume = {9},
address = {Berlin, Heidelberg},
publisher = {Springer Berlin Heidelberg},
reportid = {FZJ-2024-05522},
isbn = {978-3-662-68361-3 (print)},
series = {Techno:Phil – Aktuelle Herausforderungen der
Technikphilosophie},
pages = {57 - 72},
year = {2024},
comment = {Neuro-ProsthEthics / Heinrichs, Jan-Hendrik (Editor),
Chapter 4},
booktitle = {Neuro-ProsthEthics / Heinrichs,
Jan-Hendrik (Editor), Chapter 4},
abstract = {The chapter challenges the notion that cognitive tools are
universally beneficial and should always be deeply
integrated into cognitive systems. Instead, it proposes a
taxonomy that recognizes the existence of hostile and
detrimental tools and suggests that some tools might be
better suited remaining on the periphery of an extended
cognitive system. The chapter explores the moral
implications of deep integration between cognitive tools and
systems, highlighting three potential detriments: narrows,
detours, and dead ends. These adverse effects present moral
challenges and call for cautious consideration during
technology development. The text emphasizes that the list of
detrimental effects is likely to expand as technology
advances and further investigations uncover additional
impacts on cognitive systems.},
cin = {INM-7},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)INM-7-20090406},
pnm = {5255 - Neuroethics and Ethics of Information (POF4-525)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5255},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)7},
doi = {10.1007/978-3-662-68362-0_4},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/1030930},
}