% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Mller:1031202,
author = {Müller, Veronika I. and Cieslik, Edna C. and Ficco, Linda
and Tyralla, Sandra and Sepehry, Amir Ali and Aziz-Safaie,
Taraneh and Feng, Chunliang and Eickhoff, Simon B. and
Langner, Robert},
title = {{N}ot {A}ll {S}troop-{T}ype {T}asks {A}re {A}like:
{A}ssessing the {I}mpact of {S}timulus {M}aterial, {T}ask
{D}esign, and {C}ognitive {D}emand via {M}eta-analyses
{A}cross {N}euroimaging {S}tudies},
journal = {Neuropsychology review},
volume = {-},
issn = {1040-7308},
address = {Dordrecht [u.a.]},
publisher = {Springer Science + Business Media B.V},
reportid = {FZJ-2024-05602},
pages = {-},
year = {2024},
abstract = {The Stroop effect is one of the most often studied examples
of cognitive conflict processing. Over time, many variants
of the classic Stroop task were used, including versions
with different stimulus material, control conditions,
presentation design, and combinations with additional
cognitive demands. The neural and behavioral impact of this
experimental variety, however, has never been systematically
assessed. We used activation likelihood meta-analysis to
summarize neuroimaging findings with Stroop-type tasks and
to investigate whether involvement of the multiple-demand
network (anterior insula, lateral frontal cortex,
intraparietal sulcus, superior/inferior parietal lobules,
midcingulate cortex, and pre-supplementary motor area) can
be attributed to resolving some higher-order conflict that
all of the tasks have in common, or if aspects that vary
between task versions lead to specialization within this
network. Across 133 neuroimaging experiments, incongruence
processing in the color-word Stroop variant consistently
recruited regions of the multiple-demand network, with
modulation of spatial convergence by task variants. In
addition, the neural patterns related to solving Stroop-like
interference differed between versions of the task that use
different stimulus material, with the only overlap between
color-word, emotional picture-word, and other types of
stimulus material in the posterior medial frontal cortex and
right anterior insula. Follow-up analyses on behavior
reported in these studies (in total 164 effect sizes)
revealed only little impact of task variations on the mean
effect size of reaction time. These results suggest
qualitative processing differences among the family of
Stroop variants, despite similar task difficulty levels, and
should carefully be considered when planning or interpreting
Stroop-type neuroimaging experiments.Keywords: Activation
likelihood estimation; Cognitive control; Interference
resolution; Neuroimaging meta-analysis; Stroop.},
cin = {INM-7},
ddc = {610},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)INM-7-20090406},
pnm = {5251 - Multilevel Brain Organization and Variability
(POF4-525)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5251},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
doi = {10.1007/s11065-024-09647-1},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/1031202},
}