% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{Zafar:1031282,
      author       = {Zafar, Mandy},
      title        = {{N}ormativity and {AI} moral agency},
      journal      = {AI and ethics},
      volume       = {5},
      issn         = {2730-5953},
      address      = {[Cham]},
      publisher    = {Springer},
      reportid     = {FZJ-2024-05644},
      pages        = {2605–2622},
      year         = {2025},
      abstract     = {The meanings of the concepts of moral agency in application
                      to AI technologies differ vastly from the ones we use for
                      humanagents. Minimal definitions of AI moral agency are
                      often connected with other normative agency-related
                      concepts, such asrationality or intelligence, autonomy, or
                      responsibility. This paper discusses the problematic
                      application of minimal conceptsof moral agency to AI. I
                      explore why any comprehensive account of AI moral agency has
                      to consider the interconnections toother normative
                      agency-related concepts and beware of four basic detrimental
                      mistakes in the current debate. The results ofthe analysis
                      are: (1) speaking about AI agency may lead to serious
                      demarcation problems and confusing assumptions aboutthe
                      abilities and prospects of AI technologies; (2) the talk of
                      AI moral agency is based on confusing assumptions and
                      turnsout to be senseless in the current prevalent versions.
                      As one possible solution, I propose to replace the concept
                      of AI agencywith the concept of AI automated performance
                      (AIAP).Keywords AI agency · AI moral agency · Artificial
                      moral agents · Philosophy of artificial intelligence},
      cin          = {INM-7},
      ddc          = {300},
      cid          = {I:(DE-Juel1)INM-7-20090406},
      pnm          = {5254 - Neuroscientific Data Analytics and AI (POF4-525) /
                      5255 - Neuroethics and Ethics of Information (POF4-525)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5254 / G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5255},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      doi          = {10.1007/s43681-024-00566-8},
      url          = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/1031282},
}