Hauptseite > Publikationsdatenbank > Normativity and AI moral agency > print

001     1031282
005     20250606202250.0
024 7 _ |a 10.1007/s43681-024-00566-8
|2 doi
024 7 _ |a 2730-5953
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 2730-5961
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 10.34734/FZJ-2024-05644
|2 datacite_doi
037 _ _ |a FZJ-2024-05644
082 _ _ |a 300
100 1 _ |a Zafar, Mandy
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)187564
|b 0
|e Corresponding author
|u fzj
245 _ _ |a Normativity and AI moral agency
260 _ _ |a [Cham]
|c 2025
|b Springer
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|b journal
|m journal
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|s 1749199090_30924
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
520 _ _ |a The meanings of the concepts of moral agency in application to AI technologies differ vastly from the ones we use for humanagents. Minimal definitions of AI moral agency are often connected with other normative agency-related concepts, such asrationality or intelligence, autonomy, or responsibility. This paper discusses the problematic application of minimal conceptsof moral agency to AI. I explore why any comprehensive account of AI moral agency has to consider the interconnections toother normative agency-related concepts and beware of four basic detrimental mistakes in the current debate. The results ofthe analysis are: (1) speaking about AI agency may lead to serious demarcation problems and confusing assumptions aboutthe abilities and prospects of AI technologies; (2) the talk of AI moral agency is based on confusing assumptions and turnsout to be senseless in the current prevalent versions. As one possible solution, I propose to replace the concept of AI agencywith the concept of AI automated performance (AIAP).Keywords AI agency · AI moral agency · Artificial moral agents · Philosophy of artificial intelligence
536 _ _ |a 5254 - Neuroscientific Data Analytics and AI (POF4-525)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5254
|c POF4-525
|f POF IV
|x 0
536 _ _ |a 5255 - Neuroethics and Ethics of Information (POF4-525)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5255
|c POF4-525
|f POF IV
|x 1
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to CrossRef, Journals: juser.fz-juelich.de
773 _ _ |a 10.1007/s43681-024-00566-8
|0 PERI:(DE-600)3043753-2
|p 2605–2622
|t AI and ethics
|v 5
|y 2025
|x 2730-5953
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/1031282/files/s43681-024-00566-8.pdf
|y OpenAccess
909 C O |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:1031282
|p openaire
|p open_access
|p OpenAPC_DEAL
|p driver
|p VDB
|p openCost
|p dnbdelivery
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 0
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)187564
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|b Key Technologies
|l Natural, Artificial and Cognitive Information Processing
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-520
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-525
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF4
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-500
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|v Decoding Brain Organization and Dysfunction
|9 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5254
|x 0
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|b Key Technologies
|l Natural, Artificial and Cognitive Information Processing
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-520
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-525
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF4
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-500
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|v Decoding Brain Organization and Dysfunction
|9 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5255
|x 1
914 1 _ |y 2025
915 p c |a APC keys set
|0 PC:(DE-HGF)0000
|2 APC
915 p c |a Local Funding
|0 PC:(DE-HGF)0001
|2 APC
915 p c |a DFG OA Publikationskosten
|0 PC:(DE-HGF)0002
|2 APC
915 p c |a DEAL: Springer Nature 2020
|0 PC:(DE-HGF)0113
|2 APC
915 _ _ |a OpenAccess
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0510
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300
|2 StatID
|b Medline
|d 2023-08-19
915 _ _ |a Creative Commons Attribution CC BY 4.0
|0 LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBY4
|2 HGFVOC
915 _ _ |a DEAL Springer
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)3002
|2 StatID
|d 2023-08-19
|w ger
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)INM-7-20090406
|k INM-7
|l Gehirn & Verhalten
|x 0
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)INM-7-20090406
980 _ _ |a APC
980 1 _ |a APC
980 1 _ |a FullTexts

LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21