% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{vonCossel:1032196,
author = {von Cossel, Moritz and Kunisch, Jana and Iqbal, Yasir and
Berwanger, Eva and Thiel, Theresa and Gandamalla, Gawasker
and Jablonowski, Nicolai D.},
title = {{C}ommon {T}ansy ({T}anacetum vulgare {L}.) {G}rowth on
{S}andy {S}oil—{I}nsights from a {P}ot {E}xperiment},
journal = {Agronomy},
volume = {14},
number = {10},
issn = {2073-4395},
address = {Basel},
publisher = {MDPI},
reportid = {FZJ-2024-06065},
pages = {2213 -},
year = {2024},
abstract = {The cultivation of perennial flowering wild plant species
like common tansy (Tanacetum vulgare L.) seems promising for
increasing biodiversity friendliness in rather monotonous
bioenergy cropping systems in Central Europe, particularly
on marginal sites. However, it is still unclear for which
types of marginal agricultural land common tansy would be
suitable and where; as a result, low-risk indirect land-use
change biomass production through common tansy could be
considered. Therefore, the aim of this study was to gather
initial insights into the suitability of common tansy for
sandy sites by means of a 6 L-pot experiment. For this
purpose, five replicates of three substrates were prepared:
Luvisol topsoil (control) from a field site near the
University of Hohenheim, Germany; and admixtures of 50 and
$83.4weight(wt)\%$ of sand to the control (M1, and M2),
respectively. This resulted in varying sand contents of the
substrates of 4.7 (control), 53.3 (M1), and $83.0wt\%$ (M2).
In autumn 2021, common tansy seeds were collected from
mother plants bearing the breeder’sindentifier ‘Z.8TAV
85/78’. These plants were part of a long-term field trial
initiated at Hohenheim in 2014, where common tansy was grown
as part of a wild plant mixture. In June 2022, 0.5 g of the
seeds were sown in each pot. The pots were placed in outdoor
conditions, arranged in a randomized complete block design
and watered evenly as required. At harvest in July 2023,
significant differences between the substrates in terms of
the above- (shoots) and belowground (roots) development of
the common tansy seedlings were observed. In M1, common
tansy provided notable biomass growth of $56.6\%$ of the
control, proving to be potentially suitable for low-input
cultivation under sandy soil conditions. However, an even
higher share of sand and low nutrient contents in M2
resulted in minor plant development $(14.4\%$ of the
control). Hence, field trials on sandy soils of about
$50wt\%$ of sand in the texture under tailored fertilization
and various climatic conditions are recommended.},
cin = {IBG-2},
ddc = {640},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-2-20101118},
pnm = {2171 - Biological and environmental resources for
sustainable use (POF4-217)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-2171},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
UT = {WOS:001341836900001},
doi = {10.3390/agronomy14102213},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/1032196},
}