% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@PHDTHESIS{Derbas:1032301,
author = {Derbas, Ghadeer},
title = {{O}ptimizing {A}utomated {S}hading {S}ystems in {O}ffice
{B}uildings by {E}xploring {O}ccupant {B}ehaviour},
volume = {67},
school = {Wuppertal University},
type = {Dissertation},
address = {Jülich},
publisher = {Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH Zentralbibliothek, Verlag},
reportid = {FZJ-2024-06140},
isbn = {978-3-95806-787-5},
series = {IAS Series},
pages = {9, x, 168, ccxxiii},
year = {2024},
note = {Dissertation, Wuppertal University, 2022},
abstract = {Automated shading systems represent a promising solution
for improving indoor thermal and visual conditions as well
as saving energy. However, previous studies indicate that
many existing automated shading systems fail to improve
occupants’ visual comfort and reduce the energy use as
intended in the design phase. Thus, occupants frequently
override or disable these systems, indicating their
discomfort or desire for a customized indoor environment.
Therefore, neglecting occupants’ needs and expectations in
the building design and operation process may cause
discrepancies between the predicted and actual energy
performance and sub-optimal design decision-making. To
address this issue, this research aims to explore and
evaluate the use and function of automated shading systems
in office environments for optimizing automated shading
system design and operation in existing and new buildings.
To achieve the objectives of this research, three phases
were completed. In Phase 01, the current practice of
automated shading design and operation was investigated in
19 case studies through a questionnaire. The commonly-used
shading setpoints were identified and tested. The
performance of two commercial shading control devices was
examined by an experimental and field studies. Results
indicate that commercial devices’ limited quality and
accuracy for automatic shading control could be due to
economic constraints and sensors’ positions or
inclinations. Therefore, designers may consider other design
strategies such as an intermediate blind position or
combined internal/external shading systems. In Phase 02, an
experimental study was conducted in a full-scale test cell
to evaluate the performance of an automated shading system
in terms of user behaviour and acceptance, thermal and
visual comfort under six scenarios. After each scenario, a
self-reported questionnaire was completed by the
participant. Indoor and outdoor environmental parameters,
user and system-triggered adjustments were recorded.
Different performance indicators were used. The key findings
suggest that a robust shading system (i.e., few override
actions) can be achieved by: a multi-objective control
strategy with an intermediate position, an acceptable range
of irradiance thresholds, and a decent level of adaptive
control options over the workplace. Phase 03 introduces a
field study, including design investigation, data
monitoring, a questionnaire, and simulation-based analysis.
The study focused on using automated shading systems in a
real office building to derive occupant-centric rules for
optimal shading design. The monitored data and questionnaire
analysis showed similar results, a relatively few
interactions between the occupants and the shadings systems.
The statistical analysis of the monitored data showed the
limited approach of the regression model used in this study,
while data mining techniques showed advantages in exploring
occupant behavioural patterns. The extracted lessons for
designers and researchers include: the use of double shading
systems (internal/external) can improve user satisfaction of
automated shading systems (i.e., few override actions), the
definition of control thresholds is essential, and the
deployment of light sensors is beneficial.},
cin = {IAS-7 / ICE-1},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)IAS-7-20180321 / I:(DE-Juel1)ICE-1-20170217},
pnm = {5111 - Domain-Specific Simulation $\&$ Data Life Cycle Labs
(SDLs) and Research Groups (POF4-511)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5111},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)3 / PUB:(DE-HGF)11},
urn = {urn:nbn:de:0001-20250106142415869-9941215-9},
doi = {10.34734/FZJ-2024-06140},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/1032301},
}