% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{Sauter:1032441,
      author       = {Sauter, Annika E. and Zabicki, Adam and Schüller, Thomas
                      and Baldermann, Juan Carlos and Fink, Gereon R. and
                      Mengotti, Paola and Vossel, Simone},
      title        = {{R}esponse and conflict expectations shape motor responses
                      interactively},
      journal      = {Experimental brain research},
      volume       = {242},
      number       = {11},
      issn         = {0014-4819},
      address      = {New York},
      publisher    = {Springer},
      reportid     = {FZJ-2024-06247},
      pages        = {2599 - 2612},
      year         = {2024},
      abstract     = {Efficient responses in dynamic environments rely on a
                      combination of readiness and flexibility, regulated by
                      anticipatory and online response control mechanisms. The
                      latter are required when a motor response needs to be
                      reprogrammed or when flanker stimuli induce response
                      conflict and they are crucially modulated by anticipatory
                      signals such as response and conflict expectations. The
                      mutual influence and interplay of these control processes
                      remain to be elucidated. Our behavioral study employed a
                      novel combined response cueing/conflict task designed to
                      test for interactive effects of response reprogramming and
                      conflict resolution and their modulation by expectations. To
                      this end, valid and invalid response cues were combined with
                      congruent and incongruent target flankers. Expectations were
                      modulated by systematically manipulating the proportions of
                      valid versus invalid cues and congruent versus incongruent
                      flanker stimuli in different task blocks. Reaction time and
                      accuracy were assessed in thirty-one healthy volunteers. The
                      results revealed response reprogramming and conflict
                      resolution interactions for both behavioral measures,
                      modulated by response and conflict expectations. Accuracy
                      decreased disproportionally when invalidly cued targets with
                      incongruent flankers were least expected. These findings
                      support coordinated and partially overlapping anticipatory
                      and online response control mechanisms within
                      motor-cognitive networks.},
      cin          = {INM-3},
      ddc          = {610},
      cid          = {I:(DE-Juel1)INM-3-20090406},
      pnm          = {5251 - Multilevel Brain Organization and Variability
                      (POF4-525) / DFG project G:(GEPRIS)431549029 - SFB 1451:
                      Schlüsselmechanismen normaler und krankheitsbedingt
                      gestörter motorischer Kontrolle (431549029) / DFG project
                      G:(GEPRIS)491111487 - Open-Access-Publikationskosten / 2022
                      - 2024 / Forschungszentrum Jülich (OAPKFZJ) (491111487)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5251 / G:(GEPRIS)431549029 /
                      G:(GEPRIS)491111487},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      pubmed       = {39316096},
      UT           = {WOS:001320912900001},
      doi          = {10.1007/s00221-024-06920-w},
      url          = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/1032441},
}