% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{Bandarra:1033647,
      author       = {Bandarra, Leonardo and Böschen, Stefan and Dürholt,
                      Andreas and Geiser, René and Göttsche, Malte and
                      Kretzschmar, Sophie and Niemeyer, Irmgard and Ostermann,
                      Linda and Rademacher, Lukas and Schäfer, Julian},
      title        = {{N}uclear safeguards during crises: three scenarios of
                      restricted access to nuclear interim storage facilities},
      journal      = {Zeitschrift für Friedens- und Konfliktforschung},
      volume       = {1},
      issn         = {2192-1741},
      address      = {Baden-Baden},
      publisher    = {Nomos-Verl.-Ges.},
      reportid     = {FZJ-2024-06519},
      pages        = {1},
      year         = {2024},
      abstract     = {Safeguards by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
                      play a pivotal role in preventing the proliferation of
                      nuclear weapons. Over the years, the IAEA’s safeguards
                      system has adapted to technological advancements and
                      changing political landscapes, making it more resilient and
                      flexible. This adaption is not only the result of programmes
                      aiming at preparing and foreseeing future challenges in the
                      nuclear field but also the result of several crises that
                      have occurred over the last decades, including attempts to
                      break non-proliferation commitments and limited access to
                      facilities. The aim of this article is to explore what could
                      be done in an event of unavoidable crises, with a focus on
                      interim nuclear storage facilities where the continuity of
                      knowledge is broken, and a quick and relatively reliable
                      response is needed. We conducted a scenario-based workshop
                      with multidisciplinary experts with different backgrounds
                      working in the area of peace and conflict research. The
                      workshop simulated three scenarios: (1) a terrorist
                      occupation, (2) a flood, and (3) a mismatch of information
                      following a coup d’état. This workshop revealed insights
                      into crisis management strategies, data sampling, and the
                      relevance of formal and informal interpersonal networks.},
      cin          = {IFN-2},
      ddc          = {300},
      cid          = {I:(DE-Juel1)IFN-2-20101013},
      pnm          = {1412 - Predisposal (POF4-141) / IAEA GER SP - Joint
                      Programme on the Technical Development and Further
                      Improvement of IAEA Safeguards between the Government of the
                      Federal Republic of Germany and the International Atomic
                      Energy Agency (IAEA-19781005)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-1412 / G:(DE-Juel1)IAEA-19781005},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      doi          = {10.1007/s42597-024-00126-1},
      url          = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/1033647},
}