001033708 001__ 1033708
001033708 005__ 20241212210725.0
001033708 037__ $$aFZJ-2024-06566
001033708 041__ $$aEnglish
001033708 1001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)171615$$aKrieger, Thomas$$b0$$eCorresponding author$$ufzj
001033708 1112_ $$a65th Annual Meeting of the Institute of Nuclear Materials Management$$cPortland$$d2024-07-22 - 2024-07-25$$wUSA
001033708 245__ $$aTests to assess whether a given data set of measurement results is based on a multiplicative measurement model
001033708 260__ $$c2024
001033708 300__ $$a1-10
001033708 3367_ $$2ORCID$$aCONFERENCE_PAPER
001033708 3367_ $$033$$2EndNote$$aConference Paper
001033708 3367_ $$2BibTeX$$aINPROCEEDINGS
001033708 3367_ $$2DRIVER$$aconferenceObject
001033708 3367_ $$2DataCite$$aOutput Types/Conference Paper
001033708 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)8$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aContribution to a conference proceedings$$bcontrib$$mcontrib$$s1733998470_5472
001033708 520__ $$aMany of the statistical methods used at the IAEA, such as methods for determining sampling plans or estimating the random and systematic error variances of the operator and the inspector, assume that the reported measurement results are realizations of a multiplicative measurement model. A multiplicative measurement model relates the true value of the measurand (e.g. the mass of an item, the enrichment or concentration of material) multiplicatively to the random and systematic errors of the measurement. In practice, the assumption that the observed measurement results are based on a multiplicative measurement model is rarely checked but is implicitly assumed as a fact. However, to justify the statistical methods used at the IAEA, a prior assessment as to whether a multiplicative measurement model can be assumed for a given set of measurement results is mandatory.According to the abstract submitted January 2024, we wanted to present statistical tests tailored to the specific measurement situation addressed in this paper. Due to obstacles in estimating the parameters of the statistical model, we cannot present any of the promised statistical tests. Instead, we describe the approaches we chose and why they did not work. This description is intended to demonstrate future researchers in this field which approaches they are better off not pursuing.
001033708 536__ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF4-1411$$a1411 - Nuclear Waste Disposal (POF4-141)$$cPOF4-141$$fPOF IV$$x0
001033708 536__ $$0G:(BMWi)02W6279$$aNeu- und Weiterentwicklung von Konzepten, Methoden und Techniken für die internationale Kernmaterialüberwachung, insbesondere im Rahmen der nuklearen Entsorgung (SAFEGUARDS-3) (02W6279)$$c02W6279$$x1
001033708 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aMartin, Klaus$$b1
001033708 909CO $$ooai:juser.fz-juelich.de:1033708$$pVDB
001033708 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)171615$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b0$$kFZJ
001033708 9131_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF4-141$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF4-140$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF4-100$$3G:(DE-HGF)POF4$$4G:(DE-HGF)POF$$9G:(DE-HGF)POF4-1411$$aDE-HGF$$bForschungsbereich Energie$$lNukleare Entsorgung, Sicherheit und Strahlenforschung (NUSAFE II)$$vNukleare Entsorgung$$x0
001033708 9141_ $$y2024
001033708 920__ $$lyes
001033708 9201_ $$0I:(DE-Juel1)IFN-2-20101013$$kIFN-2$$lNukleare Entsorgung$$x0
001033708 980__ $$acontrib
001033708 980__ $$aVDB
001033708 980__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)IFN-2-20101013
001033708 980__ $$aUNRESTRICTED