% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{Rttgen:1033924,
      author       = {Röttgen, Sinah and Doppler, Christopher E. J. and Seger,
                      Aline and Kalbe, Elke and Fink, Gereon Rudolf and
                      Sommerauer, Michael and Ophey, Anja},
      title        = {{C}ontext-dependency of the {REM} sleep behavior disorder
                      screening questionnaire - {C}linical utility under scrutiny},
      journal      = {Parkinsonism $\&$ related disorders},
      volume       = {130},
      issn         = {1353-8020},
      address      = {Amsterdam [u.a.]},
      publisher    = {Elsevier Science},
      reportid     = {FZJ-2024-06762},
      pages        = {107211 -},
      year         = {2025},
      abstract     = {AbstractIntroduction: The REM Sleep Behavior Disorder (RBD)
                      Screening Questionnaire (RBDSQ) is a widely established
                      screening tool for detecting isolated RBD (iRBD). However,
                      its accuracy may depend on its application context, e.g.,
                      the individuals' awareness of their RBD status. The present
                      work aims to describe the context-dependency and retest
                      reliability of the RBDSQ in an iRBD cohort setting.Methods:
                      Ninety-four individuals with video-polysomnography confirmed
                      iRBD answered the RBDSQ during pre-polysomnography screening
                      (V0) and post-diagnosis (V1).Results: The RBDSQ total score
                      significantly differed between V0 and V1 (F(1,92) = 8.02, p
                      = .006, ηp2 = 0.019). The intraclass correlation
                      coefficient (ICC2,1) of the RBDSQ showed moderate
                      reliability between consecutive timepoints (V0-V1ICC2,1 =
                      0.544). The highest Cohen's κ was reached for items 5, 6.3,
                      6.4, 8, and 9 across timepoint comparisons (0.409 ≤
                      Cohen's κ ≤ 0.660).Conclusion: Our findings underscore
                      the context-dependency of the RBDSQ and fluctuations in
                      self-awareness of sleep-related behaviors, necessitating a
                      critical appraisal of questionnaire-based RBD screening
                      tools. Future studies should explore strategies to improve
                      the reliability and accuracy of RBD screening tools,
                      considering the dynamic nature of sleep-related
                      behavior.Keywords: Disease awareness; REM sleep behavior
                      disorder; Reliability; Screening questionnaire.},
      cin          = {INM-3},
      ddc          = {610},
      cid          = {I:(DE-Juel1)INM-3-20090406},
      pnm          = {5252 - Brain Dysfunction and Plasticity (POF4-525) / DFG
                      project G:(GEPRIS)491111487 - Open-Access-Publikationskosten
                      / 2022 - 2024 / Forschungszentrum Jülich (OAPKFZJ)
                      (491111487)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5252 / G:(GEPRIS)491111487},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      pubmed       = {39608327},
      UT           = {WOS:001369003400001},
      doi          = {10.1016/j.parkreldis.2024.107211},
      url          = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/1033924},
}