% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Nazarzadeh:1033997,
author = {Nazarzadeh, Kimia and Eickhoff, Simon B. and Antonopoulos,
Georgios and Hensel, Lukas and Tscherpel, Caroline and
Komeyer, Vera and Raimondo, Federico and Müller, Veronika
and Grefkes, Christian and Patil, Kaustubh R.},
title = {{M}achine {L}earning-{D}riven {C}orrection of {H}andgrip
{S}trength: {A} {N}ovel {B}iomarker for {N}eurological and
{H}ealth {O}utcomes in the {UK} {B}iobank},
reportid = {FZJ-2024-06830},
year = {2024},
abstract = {Background: Handgrip strength (HGS) is a significant
biomarker for overall health, offering a simple,
cost-effective method for assessing muscle function. Lower
HGS is linked to higher mortality, functional decline,
cognitive impairments, and chronic diseases. Considering the
influence of anthropometrics and demographics on HGS, this
study aims to develop a corrected HGS score using machine
learning (ML) models to enhance its utility in understanding
brain health and disease. Methods: Using UK Biobank data,
sex-specific ML models were developed to predict HGS based
on three anthropometric variables and age. A novel
biomarker, ∆HGS, was introduced as the difference between
true HGS (i.e., directly measured HGS) and bias-free
predicted HGS. The neural basis of true HGS and ∆HGS was
investigated by correlating them to regional gray matter
volume (GMV). Statistical analyses were performed to test
their sensitivity to longitudinal changes in stroke and
major depressive disorder (MDD) patients compared to matched
healthy controls (HC).Results: HGS could be accurately
predicted using anthropometric and demographic features,
with linear support vector machine (SVM) demonstrating high
accuracy. Compared to true HGS, ∆HGS showed high
reassessment reliability and stronger, widespread
associations with GMV, especially in motor-related regions.
Longitudinal analysis revealed that neither HGS nor ∆HGS
effectively differentiated patients from matched HC at post
time-point.Conclusion: The proposed ∆HGS score exhibited
stronger correlations with GMV compared to true HGS,
suggesting it better represents the relationship between
muscle strength and brain structure. While not effective in
differentiating patients from HC at post time-point, the
increase in ∆HGS from pre to post time-points in patient
cohorts may indicate improved utility for monitoring disease
progression, treatment efficacy, or rehabilitation effects,
warranting further longitudinal validation.},
cin = {INM-7},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)INM-7-20090406},
pnm = {5254 - Neuroscientific Data Analytics and AI (POF4-525) /
5253 - Neuroimaging (POF4-525) / SFB 1451 B05 -
Einzelfallvorhersagen der motorischen Fähigkeiten bei
Gesunden und Patienten mit motorischen Störungen (B05)
(458640473)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5254 / G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5253 /
G:(GEPRIS)458640473},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)25},
doi = {10.1101/2024.11.27.24318057},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/1033997},
}