% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{Wagner:1034035,
      author       = {Wagner, Roman and Heinrichs, Bert},
      title        = {{F}our {N}otions of {A}utonomy. {P}itfalls of {C}onceptual
                      {P}luralism in {C}ontemporary {D}ebates},
      journal      = {Human-machine communication},
      volume       = {9},
      issn         = {2638-6038},
      address      = {Kalamazoo, MI},
      publisher    = {Communication and Social Robotics Labs, Western Michigan
                      University},
      reportid     = {FZJ-2024-06865},
      pages        = {37 - 50},
      year         = {2024},
      abstract     = {The concept of autonomy is indispensable in the history of
                      Western thought. At least that’s how it seems to us
                      nowadays. However, the notion has not always had the
                      outstanding significance that we ascribe to it today and its
                      exact meaning has also changed considerably over time. In
                      this paper, we want to shed light on different
                      understandings of autonomy and clearly distinguish them from
                      each other. Our main aim is to contribute to conceptual
                      clarity in (interdisciplinary) discourses and to point out
                      possible pitfalls of conceptual pluralism.},
      cin          = {INM-7},
      ddc          = {300},
      cid          = {I:(DE-Juel1)INM-7-20090406},
      pnm          = {5255 - Neuroethics and Ethics of Information (POF4-525)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5255},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      doi          = {10.30658/hmc.9.3},
      url          = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/1034035},
}