001     1034035
005     20241214210608.0
024 7 _ |a 10.30658/hmc.9.3
|2 doi
024 7 _ |a 2638-6038
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 2638-602X
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 10.34734/FZJ-2024-06865
|2 datacite_doi
037 _ _ |a FZJ-2024-06865
082 _ _ |a 300
100 1 _ |a Wagner, Roman
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 0
|e Corresponding author
245 _ _ |a Four Notions of Autonomy. Pitfalls of Conceptual Pluralism in Contemporary Debates
260 _ _ |a Kalamazoo, MI
|c 2024
|b Communication and Social Robotics Labs, Western Michigan University
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|b journal
|m journal
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|s 1734168850_20061
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
520 _ _ |a The concept of autonomy is indispensable in the history of Western thought. At least that’s how it seems to us nowadays. However, the notion has not always had the outstanding significance that we ascribe to it today and its exact meaning has also changed considerably over time. In this paper, we want to shed light on different understandings of autonomy and clearly distinguish them from each other. Our main aim is to contribute to conceptual clarity in (interdisciplinary) discourses and to point out possible pitfalls of conceptual pluralism.
536 _ _ |a 5255 - Neuroethics and Ethics of Information (POF4-525)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5255
|c POF4-525
|f POF IV
|x 0
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to CrossRef, Journals: juser.fz-juelich.de
700 1 _ |a Heinrichs, Bert
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)166268
|b 1
773 _ _ |a 10.30658/hmc.9.3
|g Vol. 9, p. 37 - 50
|0 PERI:(DE-600)3171226-5
|p 37 - 50
|t Human-machine communication
|v 9
|y 2024
|x 2638-6038
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/1034035/files/Four%20Notions%20of%20Autonomy.%20Pitfalls%20of%20Conceptual%20Pluralism%20in%20Con.pdf
|y OpenAccess
909 C O |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:1034035
|p openaire
|p open_access
|p VDB
|p driver
|p dnbdelivery
910 1 _ |a German Reference Centre for Ethics in the Life Sciences (DRZE)
|0 I:(DE-HGF)0
|b 0
|6 P:(DE-HGF)0
910 1 _ |a wagner@drze.de
|0 I:(DE-HGF)0
|b 0
|6 P:(DE-HGF)0
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 1
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)166268
910 1 _ |a Uni Bonn
|0 I:(DE-HGF)0
|b 1
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)166268
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|b Key Technologies
|l Natural, Artificial and Cognitive Information Processing
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-520
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-525
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF4
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-500
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|v Decoding Brain Organization and Dysfunction
|9 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5255
|x 0
914 1 _ |y 2024
915 _ _ |a OpenAccess
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0510
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
|0 LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBYNCND4
|2 HGFVOC
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0501
|2 StatID
|b DOAJ Seal
|d 2021-07-20T09:11:40Z
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0500
|2 StatID
|b DOAJ
|d 2021-07-20T09:11:40Z
915 _ _ |a Peer Review
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0030
|2 StatID
|b DOAJ : Double blind peer review
|d 2021-07-20T09:11:40Z
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)INM-7-20090406
|k INM-7
|l Gehirn & Verhalten
|x 0
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)INM-7-20090406
980 1 _ |a FullTexts


LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21