% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@INPROCEEDINGS{Fabrykiewicz:1034063,
author = {Fabrykiewicz, Piotr and Xu, Jianhui and Bhosale,
Dnyaneshwar Raghunath and Stekiel, Michal and Roessli,
Bertrand and Schmalzl, Karin and Schneidewind, Astrid and
Meven, Martin},
title = {{M}ysterious incommensurate {D}y3+ magnetic ordering in
{D}y{F}e{O}3. {S}pherical neutronpolarimetry study},
reportid = {FZJ-2024-06884},
year = {2024},
abstract = {DyFeO3 is the only known rare-earth orthoferrite with an
incommensurate magnetic ordering ofthe rare-earth element
without an external magnetic field [1,2]. DyFeO3 establish
the ordering ofthe Fe3+ sublattice, according to the Γ4
representation (magnetic space group Pb′n′m) below TN=
645 K. Below the spin-reorientation temperature TSR ≈ 65 K
magnetic moments rotate into theΓ1 (Pbnm.1) Fe3+ structure
with symmetry forbidden ferromagnetic component, making it
suitablefor spherical neutron polarimetry studies.Our
unpolarized single crystal neutron diffraction (IN12, ILL)
measurements show the temperatureevolution of DyFeO3
satellites at zero magnetic field below 4 K [3]. It is worth
comparing it withTbFeO3 [4] which orders incommensurately in
a solitonic lattice in the applied magnetic field (~ 3K and
H > 1 T). Both show long modulation periods (DyFeO3 280 Å
and TbFeO3 340 Å) and higherorder satellites (DyFeO3 up to
7th order, TbFeO3 up to 11th order). However, in DyFeO3 the
intensityratio between satellites suggests triangular
modulation (1/n2), while for TbFeO3 it is square-like
(1/n),where n is the satellite order. DyFeO3 and TbFeO3 have
different modulation vector directions, [00l]and [0k1],
respectively. The formations of incommensurate order in
DyFeO3 and TbFeO3 are offirst-order and second-order type,
respectively.The incommensurate magnetic order of Tb3+ in
TbFeO3 is reported as the solitonic lattice [4], whilefor
Dy3+ magnetic ordering in DyFeO3, three models are proposed
in the literature: (i) spin densitywave [1], (ii)
elliptical-based helical ordering [1], and (iii) spin
density wave on the top of commensurateordering [2]. Our
half polarization analysis on DyFeO3 [3] shows no magnetic
chirality termand our spherical neutron polarimetry analysis
supports the spin density wave ordering model overthe
helical ordering model (both measured on TASP, PSI).
Surprisingly, we observed a high valueof the Pxz component
of the polarization matrix measured on magnetic satellite
peaks, in contradictionwith all models proposed in the
literature [1,2]. According to the Blume-Maleev
equations,the Pxz component arises from nuclear-magnetic
interference, however, high values of the Pxz termwere
observed for (001)±q and (003)±q satellite peaks, which
are pure magnetic as (001) and (003)commensurate peaks are
nuclear-forbidden. Spherical neutron polarimetry data were
collected veryrecently and we are working on the model of
the Dy3+ magnetic ordering in DyFeO3.[1] C. Ritter, et al.;
J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 34 (2022) 265801; [2] B. Biswas,
et al.; Phys. Rev. Mater.6 (2022), 074401; [3] Under
preparation; [4] S. Artyukhin, et al.; Nat. Mater. 11 (2012)
694},
month = {Dec},
date = {2024-12-11},
organization = {Flipper 2024 as a satellite workshop
of the ILL/ESS user meeting, Institut
Laue-Langevin (ILL) located on the
European Photon and Neutron (EPN)
campus (France), 11 Dec 2024 - 13 Dec
2024},
subtyp = {Invited},
cin = {JCNS-2 / JARA-FIT / JCNS-4 / JCNS-ILL},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)JCNS-2-20110106 / $I:(DE-82)080009_20140620$ /
I:(DE-Juel1)JCNS-4-20201012 / I:(DE-Juel1)JCNS-ILL-20110128},
pnm = {632 - Materials – Quantum, Complex and Functional
Materials (POF4-632) / 6G4 - Jülich Centre for Neutron
Research (JCNS) (FZJ) (POF4-6G4)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-632 / G:(DE-HGF)POF4-6G4},
experiment = {EXP:(DE-Juel1)ILL-IN12-20150421},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)24},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/1034063},
}