001034303 001__ 1034303
001034303 005__ 20241214210610.0
001034303 0247_ $$2datacite_doi$$a10.34734/FZJ-2024-07088
001034303 037__ $$aFZJ-2024-07088
001034303 082__ $$a020
001034303 1001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)133810$$aMittermaier, Bernhard$$b0$$eCorresponding author$$ufzj
001034303 245__ $$aTransformationsverträge sind eine Sackgasse
001034303 260__ $$aMünchen$$bVDB$$c2025
001034303 3367_ $$2DRIVER$$aarticle
001034303 3367_ $$2DataCite$$aOutput Types/Journal article
001034303 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)16$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aJournal Article$$bjournal$$mjournal$$s1734192957_1048
001034303 3367_ $$2BibTeX$$aARTICLE
001034303 3367_ $$2ORCID$$aJOURNAL_ARTICLE
001034303 3367_ $$00$$2EndNote$$aJournal Article
001034303 520__ $$aThis article analyses the impact of transformative agreements on the development of the open access landscape. It is shown that, regardless of their potential economic benefits, these transformative agreements do not effectively advance the transformation of the publishing industry because they do not sufficiently promote the flipping of subscription journals into open access journals. The flipping rates of two major publishers (Springer Nature and Wiley) and the results of the cOAlition S ‘Transformative Journals’ programme are examined using various approaches, with the result that the transformation of the majority of journals to open access via transformative agreements would take many decades. As a consequence, the authors call for greater promotion of Diamond Open Access as an alternative to transformation agreements, as well as for critical evaluation of transformation agreements before their renewal.
001034303 536__ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF4-899$$a899 - ohne Topic (POF4-899)$$cPOF4-899$$fPOF IV$$x0
001034303 773__ $$0PERI:(DE-600)2774725-6$$n1$$p $$tO-bib$$v12$$x2363-9814$$y2025
001034303 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/1034303/files/Mittermaier%20Transformationsvertr%C3%A4ge%20preprint.pdf$$yOpenAccess
001034303 909CO $$ooai:juser.fz-juelich.de:1034303$$popenaire$$popen_access$$pVDB$$pdriver$$pdnbdelivery
001034303 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)133810$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b0$$kFZJ
001034303 9131_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF4-899$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF4-890$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF4-800$$3G:(DE-HGF)POF4$$4G:(DE-HGF)POF$$aDE-HGF$$bProgrammungebundene Forschung$$lohne Programm$$vohne Topic$$x0
001034303 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0510$$2StatID$$aOpenAccess
001034303 915__ $$0LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBYNV$$2V:(DE-HGF)$$aCreative Commons Attribution CC BY (No Version)$$bDOAJ$$d2021-07-21T13:50:47Z
001034303 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0501$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bDOAJ Seal$$d2021-07-21T13:50:47Z
001034303 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0500$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bDOAJ$$d2021-07-21T13:50:47Z
001034303 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0030$$2StatID$$aPeer Review$$bDOAJ : Peer review$$d2021-07-21T13:50:47Z
001034303 9201_ $$0I:(DE-Juel1)ZB-20090406$$kZB$$lZentralbibliothek$$x0
001034303 9801_ $$aFullTexts
001034303 980__ $$ajournal
001034303 980__ $$aVDB
001034303 980__ $$aUNRESTRICTED
001034303 980__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)ZB-20090406