% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{Krll:1034750,
      author       = {Kröll, Jean-Philippe and Friedrich, Patrick and Li, Xuan
                      and Nurislamova, Yulia and Kraljevic, Nevena and Geiger,
                      Anna and Mans, Julia and Waite, Laura and Caspers, Julian
                      and Qian, Xing and Chee, Michael WL and Zhou, Juan Helen and
                      Eickhoff, Simon and Weis, Susanne},
      title        = {{T}est–{R}etest {R}eliability of {M}eta {A}nalytic
                      {N}etworks {D}uring {N}aturalistic {V}iewing},
      reportid     = {FZJ-2024-07507},
      year         = {2024},
      abstract     = {Functional connectivity analyses have given considerable
                      insights into human brain function and organization. As
                      research moves towards clinical application, test-retest
                      reliability has become a main focus of the field. So far,
                      the majority of studies have relied on resting-state
                      paradigms to examine brain connectivity, based on its low
                      demand and ease of implementation. However, the reliability
                      of resting-state measures is mostly moderate, potentially
                      due to its unconstrained nature. Recently, naturalistic
                      viewing paradigms have gained popularity because they probe
                      the human brain under more ecologically valid conditions,
                      thereby possibly increasing reliability. Therefore, we here
                      compared the reliability of graph metrics extracted from
                      resting-state and naturalistic viewing in functional
                      networks, across two sessions. We show that naturalistic
                      viewing can increase reliability over resting- state, but
                      that its effect varies between stimuli and networks.
                      Furthermore, we demonstrate that the effect of naturalistic
                      viewing differs between two cohorts with Asian and European
                      cultural backgrounds. Taken together, our study encourages
                      the use of naturalistic viewing to increase reliability, but
                      emphasizes the need to carefully select the appropriate
                      stimulus and network for the respective research question.},
      cin          = {INM-7},
      cid          = {I:(DE-Juel1)INM-7-20090406},
      pnm          = {5251 - Multilevel Brain Organization and Variability
                      (POF4-525) / DFG project G:(GEPRIS)491111487 -
                      Open-Access-Publikationskosten / 2025 - 2027 /
                      Forschungszentrum Jülich (OAPKFZJ) (491111487)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5251 / G:(GEPRIS)491111487},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)25},
      doi          = {10.1101/2024.05.15.594266},
      url          = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/1034750},
}