% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Muganga:1034764,
author = {Muganga, Tobias and Sasse, Leonard and Larabi, Daouia I.
and Nieto, Nicolás and Caspers, Julian and Eickhoff, Simon
B. and Patil, Kaustubh R.},
title = {{V}oxel-wise or {R}egion-wise {N}uisance {R}egression for
{F}unctional {C}onnectivity {A}nalyses: {D}oes it matter?},
reportid = {FZJ-2024-07519},
year = {2024},
abstract = {Removal of nuisance signals (such as motion) from the BOLD
time series is an important aspect of preprocessing to
obtain meaningful resting-state functional connectivity
(rs-FC). The nuisance signals are commonly removed using
denoising procedures at the finest resolution, i.e. the
voxel time series. Typically the voxel-wise time series are
then aggregated into predefined regions or parcels to obtain
a rs-FC matrix as the correlation between pairs of regional
time series. Computational efficiency can be improved by
denoising the aggregated regional time series instead of the
voxel time series. However, a comprehensive comparison of
the effects of denoising on these two resolutions is
missing.In this study, we systematically investigate the
effects of denoising at different time series resolutions
(voxel- and region-level) in 370 unrelated subjects from the
1HCP-YA dataset. Alongside the time series resolution, we
considered additional factors such as aggregation method
(Mean and first eigenvariate [EV]) and parcellation
granularity (100, 400, and 1,000 regions). To assess the
effect of those choices on the utility of the resulting
whole-brain rs-FC, we evaluated the individual specificity
(fingerprinting) and the capacity to predict age and three
cognitive scores.Our findings show generally equal or better
performance for region-level denoising with notable
differences depending on the aggregation method. Using mean
aggregation yielded equal individual specificity and
prediction performance for voxel- and region-level
denoising. When EV was employed for aggregation, the
individual specificity of voxel-level denoising was reduced
compared to region-level denoising. Increasing parcellation
granularity generally improved individual specificity. For
the prediction of age and cognitive test scores, only fluid
intelligence indicated worse performance for voxel-level
denoising in the case of aggregating with the EV.Based on
these results, we recommend the adoption of region-level
denoising for brain-behavior investigations when using mean
aggregation. This approach offers equal individual
specificity and prediction capacity with reduced
computational resources for the analysis of rs-FC patterns.},
cin = {INM-7},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)INM-7-20090406},
pnm = {5251 - Multilevel Brain Organization and Variability
(POF4-525) / 5253 - Neuroimaging (POF4-525)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5251 / G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5253},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)25},
doi = {10.1101/2024.12.10.627766},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/1034764},
}