% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Komeyer:1034776,
author = {Komeyer, Vera and Eickhoff, Simon B. and Grefkes, Christian
and Patil, Kaustubh R. and Raimondo, Federico},
title = {{C}onfounder control in biomedicine necessitates conceptual
considerations beyond statistical evaluations},
journal = {medrxiv},
reportid = {FZJ-2024-07530},
year = {2024},
abstract = {Machine learning (ML) models hold promise in precision
medicine by enabling personalized predictions basedon
high-dimensional biomedical data. Yet, transitioning models
from prototyping to clinical applications poseschallenges,
with confounders being a significant hurdle by undermining
the reliability, generalizability, andinterpretability of ML
models. Using hand grip strength (HGS) prediction from
neuroimaging data from theUK Biobank as a case study, we
demonstrate that confounder adjustment can have a greater
impact on modelperformance than changes in features or
algorithms. An ubiquitous and necessary approach to
confounding isby statistical means. However, a pure
statistical viewpoint overlooks the biomedical relevance of
candidateconfounders, i.e. their biological link and
conceptual similarity to actual variables of interest.
Problematically,this can lead to biomedically not-meaningful
confounder-adjustment, which limits the usefulness of
resultingmodels, both in terms of biological insights and
clinical applicability. To address this, we propose a
two-dimensional framework, the Confound Continuum, that
combines both statistical association and
biomedicalrelevance, i.e. conceptual similarity, of a
candidate confounder. The evaluation of conceptual
similarityassesses on a continuum how much two variables
overlap in their biological meaning, ranging from
negligiblelinks to expressing the same underlying biology.
It thereby acknowledges the gradual nature of the
biologicallink between candidate confounders and a
predictive task. Our framework aims to create awareness for
theimperative need to complement statistical confounder
considerations with biomedical, conceptual domainknowledge
(without going into causal considerations) and thereby
offers a means to arrive at meaningful andinformed
confounder decisions. The position of a candidate confoudner
in the two-dimensional grid of theConfound Continuum can
support informed and context-specific confounder decisions
and thereby not onlyenhance biomedical validity of
predictions but also support translation of predictive
models into clinicalpractice.},
cin = {INM-7 / INM-3},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)INM-7-20090406 / I:(DE-Juel1)INM-3-20090406},
pnm = {5254 - Neuroscientific Data Analytics and AI (POF4-525) /
DFG project G:(GEPRIS)431549029 - SFB 1451:
Schlüsselmechanismen normaler und krankheitsbedingt
gestörter motorischer Kontrolle (431549029)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5254 / G:(GEPRIS)431549029},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)25},
doi = {10.1101/2024.02.02.24302198},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/1034776},
}