% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Rther:1034968,
author = {Rüther, Markus},
title = {{T}he meaningfulness gap in {AI} ethics: a guide on how to
think through a complex challenge},
journal = {AI $\&$ society},
volume = {40},
issn = {0951-5666},
address = {London},
publisher = {Springer},
reportid = {FZJ-2025-00076},
pages = {1403-1415},
year = {2024},
abstract = {Technological outsourcing is increasingly prevalent, with
AI systems taking over many tasks once performed by humans.
This shift has led to various discussions within AI ethics.
A question that was largely ignored until recently, but is
now increasingly being discussed, concerns the
meaningfulness of such a lifestyle. The literature largely
features skeptical views, raising several challenges. Many
of these challenges can be grouped under what I identify as
the “meaningfulness gap”. Although this gap is widely
acknowledged, there is a notable absence of systematic
exploration in the literature. This paper aims to fill this
void by offering a detailed, step-by-step guide for
systematically exploring the different instances of the
meaningfulness gap and aids in navigating their
complexities. More specifically, it proposes differentiating
the gaps according to their realms and objects, normative
nature, scope, and severity. To make these areas manageable,
the paper takes several taxonomies and distinctions on
board. Finally, the guide is summarized, and some skeptical
replies are anticipated and countered by clarificatory
remarks.},
cin = {INM-7},
ddc = {360},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)INM-7-20090406},
pnm = {5255 - Neuroethics and Ethics of Information (POF4-525)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5255},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
UT = {WOS:001270038800001},
doi = {10.1007/s00146-024-01993-1},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/1034968},
}