001037239 001__ 1037239
001037239 005__ 20250203133239.0
001037239 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.1002/hbm.26776
001037239 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a1065-9471
001037239 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a1097-0193
001037239 0247_ $$2datacite_doi$$a10.34734/FZJ-2025-00572
001037239 0247_ $$2pmid$$a38958131
001037239 0247_ $$2WOS$$aWOS:001260701700001
001037239 037__ $$aFZJ-2025-00572
001037239 082__ $$a610
001037239 1001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)194475$$aAsendorf, Adrian L.$$b0$$eFirst author
001037239 245__ $$aDynamic properties in functional connectivity changes and striatal dopamine deficiency in Parkinson's disease
001037239 260__ $$aNew York, NY$$bWiley-Liss$$c2024
001037239 3367_ $$2DRIVER$$aarticle
001037239 3367_ $$2DataCite$$aOutput Types/Journal article
001037239 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)16$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aJournal Article$$bjournal$$mjournal$$s1738136709_6366
001037239 3367_ $$2BibTeX$$aARTICLE
001037239 3367_ $$2ORCID$$aJOURNAL_ARTICLE
001037239 3367_ $$00$$2EndNote$$aJournal Article
001037239 500__ $$aDeutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG,German Research Foundation), Grant/AwardNumbers: 431549029, 413543196
001037239 520__ $$aRecent studies in Parkinson's disease (PD) patients reported disruptions in dynamic functional connectivity (dFC, i.e., a characterization of spontaneous fluctuations in functional connectivity over time). Here, we assessed whether the integrity of striatal dopamine terminals directly modulates dFC metrics in two separate PD cohorts, indexing dopamine-related changes in large-scale brain network dynamics and its implications in clinical features. We pooled data from two disease-control cohorts reflecting early PD. From the Parkinson's Progression Marker Initiative (PPMI) cohort, resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rsfMRI) and dopamine transporter (DaT) single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) were available for 63 PD patients and 16 age- and sex-matched healthy controls. From the clinical research group 219 (KFO) cohort, rsfMRI imaging was available for 52 PD patients and 17 age- and sex-matched healthy controls. A subset of 41 PD patients and 13 healthy control subjects additionally underwent 18F-DOPA-positron emission tomography (PET) imaging. The striatal synthesis capacity of 18F-DOPA PET and dopamine terminal quantity of DaT SPECT images were extracted for the putamen and the caudate. After rsfMRI pre-processing, an independent component analysis was performed on both cohorts simultaneously. Based on the derived components, an individual sliding window approach (44 s window) and a subsequent k-means clustering were conducted separately for each cohort to derive dFC states (reemerging intra- and interindividual connectivity patterns). From these states, we derived temporal metrics, such as average dwell time per state, state attendance, and number of transitions and compared them between groups and cohorts. Further, we correlated these with the respective measures for local dopaminergic impairment and clinical severity. The cohorts did not differ regarding age and sex. Between cohorts, PD groups differed regarding disease duration, education, cognitive scores and L-dopa equivalent daily dose. In both cohorts, the dFC analysis resulted in three distinct states, varying in connectivity patterns and strength. In the PPMI cohort, PD patients showed a lower state attendance for the globally integrated (GI) state and a lower number of transitions than controls. Significantly, worse motor scores (Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale Part III) and dopaminergic impairment in the putamen and the caudate were associated with low average dwell time in the GI state and a low total number of transitions. These results were not observed in the KFO cohort: No group differences in dFC measures or associations between dFC variables and dopamine synthesis capacity were observed. Notably, worse motor performance was associated with a low number of bidirectional transitions between the GI and the lesser connected (LC) state across the PD groups of both cohorts. Hence, in early PD, relative preservation of motor performance may be linked to a more dynamic engagement of an interconnected brain state. Specifically, those large-scale network dynamics seem to relate to striatal dopamine availability. Notably, most of these results were obtained only for one cohort, suggesting that dFC is impacted by certain cohort features like educational level, or disease severity. As we could not pinpoint these features with the data at hand, we suspect that other, in our case untracked, demographical features drive connectivity dynamics in PD. PRACTITIONER POINTS: Exploring dopamine's role in brain network dynamics in two Parkinson's disease (PD) cohorts, we unraveled PD-specific changes in dynamic functional connectivity. Results in the Parkinson's Progression Marker Initiative (PPMI) and the KFO cohort suggest motor performance may be linked to a more dynamic engagement and disengagement of an interconnected brain state. Results only in the PPMI cohort suggest striatal dopamine availability influences large-scale network dynamics that are relevant in motor control.Keywords: DAT SPECT; F‐DOPA PET; dynamic functional connectivity; imaging; network; resting‐state fMRI.
001037239 536__ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5251$$a5251 - Multilevel Brain Organization and Variability (POF4-525)$$cPOF4-525$$fPOF IV$$x0
001037239 536__ $$0G:(GEPRIS)431549029$$aDFG project G:(GEPRIS)431549029 - SFB 1451: Schlüsselmechanismen normaler und krankheitsbedingt gestörter motorischer Kontrolle (431549029)$$c431549029$$x1
001037239 536__ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5253$$a5253 - Neuroimaging (POF4-525)$$cPOF4-525$$fPOF IV$$x2
001037239 588__ $$aDataset connected to CrossRef, Journals: juser.fz-juelich.de
001037239 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aTheis, Hendrik$$b1
001037239 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aTittgemeyer, Marc$$b2
001037239 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aTimmermann, Lars$$b3
001037239 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)131720$$aFink, Gereon R.$$b4
001037239 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)177611$$aDrzezga, Alexander$$b5
001037239 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aEggers, Carsten$$b6
001037239 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aRuppert-Junck, Marina C.$$b7
001037239 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aPedrosa, David J.$$b8
001037239 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aHoenig, Merle C.$$b9
001037239 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)207799$$avan Eimeren, Thilo$$b10$$eCorresponding author$$ufzj
001037239 773__ $$0PERI:(DE-600)1492703-2$$a10.1002/hbm.26776$$gVol. 45, no. 10, p. e26776$$n10$$pe26776$$tHuman brain mapping$$v45$$x1065-9471$$y2024
001037239 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/1037239/files/PDF.pdf$$yOpenAccess
001037239 909CO $$ooai:juser.fz-juelich.de:1037239$$pdnbdelivery$$pdriver$$pVDB$$popen_access$$popenaire
001037239 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)194475$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b0$$kFZJ
001037239 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)131720$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b4$$kFZJ
001037239 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)177611$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b5$$kFZJ
001037239 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)207799$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b10$$kFZJ
001037239 9131_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF4-525$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF4-520$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF4-500$$3G:(DE-HGF)POF4$$4G:(DE-HGF)POF$$9G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5251$$aDE-HGF$$bKey Technologies$$lNatural, Artificial and Cognitive Information Processing$$vDecoding Brain Organization and Dysfunction$$x0
001037239 9131_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF4-525$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF4-520$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF4-500$$3G:(DE-HGF)POF4$$4G:(DE-HGF)POF$$9G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5253$$aDE-HGF$$bKey Technologies$$lNatural, Artificial and Cognitive Information Processing$$vDecoding Brain Organization and Dysfunction$$x1
001037239 9141_ $$y2024
001037239 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0200$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bSCOPUS$$d2024-12-19
001037239 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0160$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bEssential Science Indicators$$d2024-12-19
001037239 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1050$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bBIOSIS Previews$$d2024-12-19
001037239 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1190$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bBiological Abstracts$$d2024-12-19
001037239 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0600$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bEbsco Academic Search$$d2024-12-19
001037239 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0510$$2StatID$$aOpenAccess
001037239 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)3001$$2StatID$$aDEAL Wiley$$d2024-12-19$$wger
001037239 915__ $$0LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBYNCND4$$2HGFVOC$$aCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
001037239 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0501$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bDOAJ Seal$$d2024-08-08T17:07:28Z
001037239 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0500$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bDOAJ$$d2024-08-08T17:07:28Z
001037239 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1030$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bCurrent Contents - Life Sciences$$d2024-12-19
001037239 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0700$$2StatID$$aFees$$d2024-12-19
001037239 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0150$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bWeb of Science Core Collection$$d2024-12-19
001037239 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0113$$2StatID$$aWoS$$bScience Citation Index Expanded$$d2024-12-19
001037239 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0030$$2StatID$$aPeer Review$$bASC$$d2024-12-19
001037239 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0561$$2StatID$$aArticle Processing Charges$$d2024-12-19
001037239 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0300$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bMedline$$d2024-12-19
001037239 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0420$$2StatID$$aNationallizenz$$d2024-12-19$$wger
001037239 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0199$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bClarivate Analytics Master Journal List$$d2024-12-19
001037239 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0030$$2StatID$$aPeer Review$$bDOAJ : Anonymous peer review$$d2024-08-08T17:07:28Z
001037239 920__ $$lyes
001037239 9201_ $$0I:(DE-Juel1)INM-3-20090406$$kINM-3$$lKognitive Neurowissenschaften$$x0
001037239 9201_ $$0I:(DE-Juel1)INM-2-20090406$$kINM-2$$lMolekulare Organisation des Gehirns$$x1
001037239 980__ $$ajournal
001037239 980__ $$aVDB
001037239 980__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)INM-3-20090406
001037239 980__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)INM-2-20090406
001037239 980__ $$aUNRESTRICTED
001037239 9801_ $$aFullTexts