001     1037611
005     20251013202054.0
024 7 _ |a 10.1093/neuonc/noae205
|2 doi
024 7 _ |a 1522-8517
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 1523-5866
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 10.34734/FZJ-2025-00782
|2 datacite_doi
037 _ _ |a FZJ-2025-00782
082 _ _ |a 610
100 1 _ |a Zeyen, Thomas
|0 0009-0006-2919-8622
|b 0
|e Corresponding author
245 _ _ |a Quantitative assessment of residual tumor is a strong and independent predictor of survival in methylated glioblastoma following radiochemotherapy with lomustine/temozolomide
260 _ _ |a Oxford
|c 2025
|b Oxford Univ. Press
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|b journal
|m journal
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|s 1760337229_32277
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
500 _ _ |a The CeTeG/NOA-09 trial was funded by the German Ministry for Education and Research.
520 _ _ |a ackground: Maximum tumor resection improves overall survival (OS) in patients with glioblastoma. The extent of resection (EOR) is historically dichotomized. The RANO resect group recently proposed criteria for volumetry-based EOR assessment in patients that were treated according to Stupp´s protocol. The purpose of this study was (1) to investigate the prognostic value of EOR in patients receiving combined chemotherapy with lomustine (CCNU)/temozolomide (TMZ), and (2) to analyse the prognostic performance of binary EOR assessment compared to volumetric assessment.Methods: 78 patients with newly diagnosed MGMT-methylated GBM undergoing tumor resection followed by radiochemotherapy with CCNU/TMZ were included in this study. Residual contrast-enhancing (CE) tumor volume after the first resection was measured and its influence on OS and PFS was analysed using uni- and multivariable Cox regression analysis as well as two-sided log rank test. Patients were divided into RTV ≤1 cm³, >1 cm³ - ≤5 cm³ and >5 cm³ following the proposed criteria of the RANO resect group.Results: Prolonged OS was associated with age <60 years, low RTV, and gross total resection (GTR). Residual tumor volume (RTV) had a superior prognostic value compared to binary EOR assessment. Patients with total or near total resection of CE tumor (≤1 cm³ RTV) showed prolonged OS (median 54.4 months, 95% CI 46.94-not reached), with a 5-year survival rate of 49%.Conclusion: Low RTV is associated with increased survival in glioblastoma patients undergoing radiochemotherapy with CCNU/TMZ. This study demonstrates the applicability of the recently proposed RANO resect criteria in this subgroup of patients.Keywords: MGMT-promotor; extend of resection; glioblastoma; residual tumor volume.
536 _ _ |a 5252 - Brain Dysfunction and Plasticity (POF4-525)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5252
|c POF4-525
|f POF IV
|x 0
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to CrossRef, Journals: juser.fz-juelich.de
700 1 _ |a Böhm, Laura
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 1
700 1 _ |a Paech, Daniel
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 2
700 1 _ |a Schäfer, Niklas
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 3
700 1 _ |a Tzaridis, Theophilos
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 4
700 1 _ |a Duffy, Cathrina
|b 5
700 1 _ |a Nitsch, Louisa
|b 6
700 1 _ |a Schneider, Matthias
|0 0000-0002-6025-7479
|b 7
700 1 _ |a Potthoff, Anna-Laura
|b 8
700 1 _ |a Schneider-Rothhaar, Javen Lennard
|b 9
700 1 _ |a Steinbach, Joachim Peter
|b 10
700 1 _ |a Hau, Peter
|b 11
700 1 _ |a Kowalski, Thomas
|b 12
700 1 _ |a Seidel, Clemens
|b 13
700 1 _ |a Krex, Dietmar
|b 14
700 1 _ |a Grauer, Oliver
|b 15
700 1 _ |a Goldbrunner, Roland
|b 16
700 1 _ |a Zeiner, Pia Susan
|b 17
700 1 _ |a Tabatabai, Ghazaleh
|0 0000-0002-3542-8782
|b 18
700 1 _ |a Galldiks, Norbert
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)143792
|b 19
700 1 _ |a Stummer, Walter
|0 0000-0002-3460-0640
|b 20
700 1 _ |a Hattingen, Elke
|b 21
700 1 _ |a Glas, Martin
|0 0000-0003-3167-3403
|b 22
700 1 _ |a Gkika, Eleni
|b 23
700 1 _ |a Vatter, Hartmut
|b 24
700 1 _ |a Radbruch, Alexander
|b 25
700 1 _ |a Herrlinger, Ulrich
|b 26
700 1 _ |a Weller, Johannes
|b 27
700 1 _ |a Schaub, Christina
|b 28
773 _ _ |a 10.1093/neuonc/noae205
|g p. noae205
|0 PERI:(DE-600)2094060-9
|n 2
|p 557-566
|t Neuro-Oncology
|v 27
|y 2025
|x 1522-8517
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/1037611/files/PDF-8.pdf
856 4 _ |y Published on 2024-10-01. Available in OpenAccess from 2025-10-01.
|u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/1037611/files/post-print.pdf
909 C O |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:1037611
|p openaire
|p open_access
|p VDB
|p driver
|p dnbdelivery
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 19
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)143792
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|b Key Technologies
|l Natural, Artificial and Cognitive Information Processing
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-520
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-525
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF4
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-500
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|v Decoding Brain Organization and Dysfunction
|9 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5252
|x 0
914 1 _ |y 2025
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200
|2 StatID
|b SCOPUS
|d 2024-12-11
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300
|2 StatID
|b Medline
|d 2024-12-11
915 _ _ |a IF >= 15
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)9915
|2 StatID
|b NEURO-ONCOLOGY : 2022
|d 2024-12-11
915 _ _ |a JCR
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100
|2 StatID
|b NEURO-ONCOLOGY : 2022
|d 2024-12-11
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0113
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index Expanded
|d 2024-12-11
915 _ _ |a Embargoed OpenAccess
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0530
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150
|2 StatID
|b Web of Science Core Collection
|d 2024-12-11
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0160
|2 StatID
|b Essential Science Indicators
|d 2024-12-11
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1110
|2 StatID
|b Current Contents - Clinical Medicine
|d 2024-12-11
915 _ _ |a Nationallizenz
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0420
|2 StatID
|d 2024-12-11
|w ger
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199
|2 StatID
|b Clarivate Analytics Master Journal List
|d 2024-12-11
920 _ _ |l yes
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)INM-3-20090406
|k INM-3
|l Kognitive Neurowissenschaften
|x 0
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)INM-3-20090406
980 1 _ |a FullTexts


LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21