% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@INPROCEEDINGS{Kroll:1037885,
author = {Kroll, Tina and Miranda, Alan and Drechsel, Alexandra and
Klein, Sabina and Beer, Simone and Neumaier, Bernd and
Drzezga, Alexander and Rosa-Neto, Pedro and Verhaeghe,
Jeroen and Elmenhorst, David and Bauer, Andreas},
title = {{F}easibility and reproducibility of awake positron
emission tomography with the adenosine {A}1 receptor
radiotracer [18{F}]{CPFPX} in moving rats: {C}onsiderations
of reference region and route of injection},
reportid = {FZJ-2025-01028},
year = {2024},
abstract = {To prevent motion artifacts in small animal positron
emission tomography (PET), animals are routinely scanned
under anesthesia or physical restraint. Both may potentially
alter metabolism and neurochemistry [1]. This study
investigates the feasibility and reproducibility of PET
brain imaging in moving rats using the adenosine A1 receptor
tracer 18F-CPFPX and subsequent point-source based motion
correction [2]. Second, we focus on the optimization of the
reference region used for absolute quantification of data
and the simplification of radiotracer injection via
intraperitoneal administration.Eight male rats underwent six
randomized dynamic PET scans each following either an
intravenous (i.v.) or intraperitoneal (i.p.) bolus of
18F-CPFPX. For both conditions, two subsequent scans were
performed under awake condition followed by a scan under
isoflurane anesthesia. The outcome parameter BPND determined
via the simplified reference-tissue model (reference:
olfactory bulb or pons) was evaluated in terms of
variability and reproducibility. In vitro 3H-DPCPX
saturation autoradiography of the same animals served for
validation of in vivo outcome parameters.Route of injection
(i.v. versus i.p.) did not have any impact on BPND neither
when modelling data with reference region olfactory bulb nor
pons. However, 18F-CPFPX uptake and BPND was lower in awake
imaging independent of injection route or reference region.
In vitro Bmax and 18F-CPFPX BPNDpons correlated
significantly (all p<0.01) for i.v. (r=0.81-0.86) and i.p.
(r=0.81-0.88) injection route under awake and anesthetized
condition. Correlations were slightly superior in comparison
to data modelled with the olfactory bulb (r=0.79-0.83).
Test-retest stability of BPNDpons after i.p. tracer
injection performed best when comparing the different
conditions and gave reliable results in awake animals with
high test-retest correlations (r=0.99, p<0.01) and an
acceptable absolute variability (mean over investigated
regions $15.3±5.8\%).Quantitative$ awake small animal PET
imaging with 18F-CPFPX is feasible and reproducible. Imaging
protocols can be improved by applying a reference region
with lower probability of radioactive spill-in from
point-sources and practicability can be enhanced by i.p.
tracer injection without loss of quantitative accuracy.},
month = {Mar},
date = {2024-03-12},
organization = {19th European Molecular Imaging
Meeting, Porto (Portugal), 12 Mar 2024
- 15 Mar 2024},
subtyp = {After Call},
cin = {INM-2},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)INM-2-20090406},
pnm = {5253 - Neuroimaging (POF4-525) / NEURON Cofund - ERA NET
NEURON in the area of brain-related diseases and disorders
of the nervous system (680966)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5253 / G:(EU-Grant)680966},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)6},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/1037885},
}