% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@MASTERSTHESIS{Rubab:1038345,
      author       = {Rubab, Uma Tur},
      title        = {{N}eural correlates of response selection involved during
                      forced choice paradigms: a neuroimaging meta-analysis},
      school       = {Rheinland-Pfälzische Technische Universität
                      Kaiserslautern-Landau},
      type         = {Masterarbeit},
      reportid     = {FZJ-2025-01342},
      pages        = {54},
      year         = {2024},
      note         = {Masterarbeit, Rheinland-Pfälzische Technische Universität
                      Kaiserslautern-Landau, 2024},
      abstract     = {The appropriate motor responses must be selected and
                      executed in a given context to facilitate goal-directed
                      behaviour. Here, we aimed to delineate the brain regions
                      that are involved in the selection of motor responses via
                      quantitative meta-analysis of pertinent neuroimaging
                      studies. In particular, we investigated the core neural
                      correlates involved during forced two-choice response
                      selection paradigms. In total, our sample comprised 48
                      studies: 25 for forced two-choice response selection with
                      two-motor response options and 23 studies for forced
                      two-choice response selection with respond and not-respond
                      options, including 2,988 subjects in 48 contrasts with 1,054
                      activation foci. Consistent convergence in both datasets has
                      been seen in the bilateral fronto-parietal network, the
                      brain regions that may form the core network subserving
                      response selection in humans, including the
                      pre-supplementary motor area (preSMA), precentral gyrus,
                      superior parietal lobule, and subcortical
                      structures—putamen and bilateral cerebellum VI. Whereas
                      several regions were sensitive to specific task components,
                      e.g., the lateral occipital cortex and occipital fusiform
                      gyrus were selectively active, which are thought to be
                      involved during more complex visual processing of stimuli.
                      In general, the Response Selection construct with respect to
                      both impressions (i.e., Two Motor Response and Respond and
                      Not-respond) engaged the same neural network despite the
                      difference in the number of possible motor response options.
                      Here, we discussed the possible functional roles of various
                      nodes of this network as well as implications of our
                      findings for a theoretical account of response selection. In
                      conclusion, the shortcomings of previous studies are
                      considered, and suggestions for future research are
                      provided.Keywords: response selection, forced two-choice,
                      (f)MRI, meta-analysis, activation likelihood estimation
                      (ALE) algorithm},
      cin          = {INM-7},
      cid          = {I:(DE-Juel1)INM-7-20090406},
      pnm          = {5251 - Multilevel Brain Organization and Variability
                      (POF4-525) / 5253 - Neuroimaging (POF4-525)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5251 / G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5253},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)19},
      doi          = {10.34734/FZJ-2025-01342},
      url          = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/1038345},
}