% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@MASTERSTHESIS{ElKholy:1038346,
      author       = {El Kholy, Helena},
      title        = {{NEURAL} {CORRELATES} {OF} {CONFLICTS}.{D}elineating the
                      {N}eural {C}orrelates of {C}onflict {A}rising {F}rom
                      {D}ifferent {T}ask {T}ypes {W}ithin the {D}imensional
                      {O}verlap {M}odel},
      school       = {HHU Düsseldorf},
      type         = {Bachelorarbeit},
      reportid     = {FZJ-2025-01343},
      pages        = {120},
      year         = {2024},
      note         = {Bachelorarbeit, HHU Düsseldorf, 2024},
      abstract     = {Interference control is an essential skill humans use in
                      their everyday life to focus on relevant information and to
                      filter out irrelevant information in their environment.
                      Popular tools to measure this cognitive ability are the
                      Stroop and Flanker paradigms. Interference control can be
                      influenced by conflicts arising from the relations of
                      stimulus dimensions (SS conflict) and stimulus and response
                      dimensions (SR conflict) which are defined according to the
                      Dimensional Overlap Model, as well as from effects of the
                      paradigm used. This study systematically assesses neuronal
                      correlates of interference processing related to the (1)
                      underlying SS or SR conflicts and (2) paradigm-type, as well
                      as the involvement of the multiple demand system for
                      resolving these conflicts. Activation likelihood estimation
                      meta-analyses were used to analyze 85 Stroop and 41 Flanker
                      experiments. Conjunction analyses (1) across tasks with the
                      same underlying conflict and (2) across tasks of the same
                      paradigm were conducted to reveal neural commonalities. The
                      pMFC and left intra parietal sulcus were identified as core
                      regions of the SS conflict, while right anterior insula and
                      right intra parietal sulcus were identified as core regions
                      of the additional SR conflict. The conjunction
                      analysisrevealed additional conflict-independent conjoint
                      involvement of left anterior insula and left inferior
                      frontal junction across Stroop tasks, while no additional
                      regions were found across the Flanker tasks. Hence, both SS
                      and SR conflict recruit key regions of the multiple demand
                      network, with additional regions showing paradigm effects
                      for the Stroop task. These results suggest an influence of
                      underlying conflict and paradigm-type indicating both must
                      be considered when measuring interference control.Keywords:
                      interference control, stimulus conflict, stimulus response
                      conflict, dimensional overlap, Flanker, Stroop, activation
                      likelihood estimation, meta-analysis},
      cin          = {INM-7},
      cid          = {I:(DE-Juel1)INM-7-20090406},
      pnm          = {5252 - Brain Dysfunction and Plasticity (POF4-525)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5252},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)2},
      doi          = {10.34734/FZJ-2025-01343},
      url          = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/1038346},
}