% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@INPROCEEDINGS{Uecker:1038448,
author = {Uecker, Jan and Vibhu, Vaibhav and Unachukwu, Ifeanyichukwu
Daniel and Vinke, Izaak C. and de Haart, L. G. J. and
Eichel, Rüdiger-A.},
title = {{E}lectrochemical {A}ctivity and {S}tability of {P}ure
{G}adolinium {D}oped {C}eria as {F}uel {E}lectrode in
{S}olid {O}xide {E}lectrolysis {C}ell},
reportid = {FZJ-2025-01444},
year = {2023},
abstract = {The state-of-the-art fuel electrode materials for solid
oxide electrolysis cells (SOECs) are Ni-cermets due to their
high electro-catalytic activity, high electrical
conductivity and the low price. However, one major concern
that must be solved for a widespread commercialisation is
their poor degradation behaviour during electrolysis
operation caused by for example Ni migration, depletion and
agglomeration in the fuel electrode. One strategy to improve
the durability of SOECs is the usage of alternative fuel
electrode materials. For instance, completely Ni-free fuel
electrodes may solve the problems of morphological
degradation during operation and further could enhance redox
cycling stability. Within possible candidates, gadolinium
doped ceria (GDC) is an interesting material due to good
stability towards carbon deposition and the possibility to
host electro catalysis in electrolysis reactions [1, 2].
Furthermore, GDC (Ce0.8Gd0.2O2-δ) shows electronic
conducting (700 °C, 0.028 S·cm-1) and ionic conducting
(700 °C, 0.47 S·cm-1) properties at low partial pressures
of oxygen and high temperatures [3]. Hence, in this work we
have prepared electrolyte supported single cells with GDC
(Ce0.8Gd0.2O2-δ) as single phase fuel electrode for their
use as SOEC. The single cells (GDC//8YSZ//GDC//LSCF) were
characterized by electrochemical impedance spectroscopy
(EIS) and current-voltage characteristics in steam
electrolysis, co-electrolysis and CO2 electrolysis
conditions exhibiting 70 $\%$ of the performance compared to
similar produced Ni-GDC fuel electrode single cells at 900
°C [4]. Furthermore, the results include process analysis
by EIS, long term stability experiments for steam
electrolysis and CO2 electrolysis conditions of at least
1000 hours and post characterization of the degraded cells
by EIS, SEM and EDX analysis.[1] Nakmura et al. Journal of
the Electrochemical Society155 (2008) B563.[2] Chueh et al.
Nature Materials11 (2012) 155-161.[3] Maricle et al. Solid
State Ionics52 (1992) 173-182.[4] Unachukwu et al. Journal
of Power Sources556 (2023) 232436.},
month = {Jul},
date = {2023-07-02},
organization = {SOFC: Eighteenth International
Symposium on Solid Oxide Fuel Cells
(SOFC-XVIII), Boston (USA), 2 Jul 2023
- 7 Jul 2023},
cin = {IEK-9},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-9-20110218},
pnm = {1232 - Power-based Fuels and Chemicals (POF4-123) / HITEC -
Helmholtz Interdisciplinary Doctoral Training in Energy and
Climate Research (HITEC) (HITEC-20170406)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-1232 / G:(DE-Juel1)HITEC-20170406},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)1},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/1038448},
}