001038674 001__ 1038674
001038674 005__ 20250310131246.0
001038674 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.3389/fmed.2024.1444567
001038674 0247_ $$2datacite_doi$$a10.34734/FZJ-2025-01639
001038674 0247_ $$2pmid$$a39629235
001038674 0247_ $$2WOS$$aWOS:001368486400001
001038674 037__ $$aFZJ-2025-01639
001038674 082__ $$a610
001038674 1001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aLuegering, Anneke$$b0
001038674 245__ $$aAssessing self-administration of medication: video-based evaluation of patient performance in the ABLYMED study
001038674 260__ $$aLausanne$$bFrontiers Media$$c2024
001038674 3367_ $$2DRIVER$$aarticle
001038674 3367_ $$2DataCite$$aOutput Types/Journal article
001038674 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)16$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aJournal Article$$bjournal$$mjournal$$s1739177176_11504
001038674 3367_ $$2BibTeX$$aARTICLE
001038674 3367_ $$2ORCID$$aJOURNAL_ARTICLE
001038674 3367_ $$00$$2EndNote$$aJournal Article
001038674 520__ $$aBackground: Older adults often face challenges in medication management due to multimorbidity and complex medication regimens, which frequently go unreported. Unrecognized problems, however, may lead to a loss of drug efficacy and harmful side effects. This study aimed to quantify the prevalence of such problems by applying a novel video-based assessment procedure in a sample of elderly patients.Methods: In this study, 67 elderly in-patients (≥70 years old and regularly taking ≥5 different drugs autonomously) from the ABLYMED study participated in a placebo-based assessment of medication management with five different dosage forms in an instructed manner while being filmed. Patient performance was quantified by the median value of two raters who evaluated each step of medication administration, which were summed to sum scores for each dosage form and an overall impression for each dosage form with a standardized and previously validated rating scheme.Results: The median (Q1;Q3) sum score for tablets was 7.0 (5.0;8.0) with a theoretical range between 4.0 and 17.0, for eye-drops 2.0 (1.0;2.0) with a theoretical range between 1.0 and 5.0, for oral drops 4.0 (3.0;6.0) with a theoretical range between 3.0 and 12.0, for pens 7.0 (5.0;9.0) with a theoretical range between 4.0 and 17.0 and for patches 5.0 (4.0;7.0) with a theoretical range between 3.0 and 15.0. The most difficult step of medication administration was peeling off the protective liner of a patch: 30% had severe difficulties or it was not possible, 21% had moderate difficulties and 49% had mild or no difficulties.Discussion: In a sample of patients with autonomous medication management, our novel assessment procedure identified a substantial fraction of patients with handling problems for each dosage form. This suggests that patients´ medication management problems should be assessed regularly in clinical routine and tackled by patient-individual training or modification of the prescribed drug regimens to achieve effective drug therapy in the elderly.
001038674 536__ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5252$$a5252 - Brain Dysfunction and Plasticity (POF4-525)$$cPOF4-525$$fPOF IV$$x0
001038674 588__ $$aDataset connected to CrossRef, Journals: juser.fz-juelich.de
001038674 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)131693$$aLangner, Robert$$b1$$eCorresponding author
001038674 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aWilm, Stefan$$b2
001038674 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aDoeppner, Thorsten R.$$b3
001038674 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aHermann, Dirk M.$$b4
001038674 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aFrohnhofen, Helmut$$b5
001038674 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aGronewold, Janine$$b6$$eCorresponding author
001038674 773__ $$0PERI:(DE-600)2775999-4$$a10.3389/fmed.2024.1444567$$gVol. 11, p. 1444567$$p1444567$$tFrontiers in medicine$$v11$$x2296-858X$$y2024
001038674 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/1038674/files/fmed-11-1444567.pdf$$yOpenAccess
001038674 909CO $$ooai:juser.fz-juelich.de:1038674$$pdnbdelivery$$pdriver$$pVDB$$popen_access$$popenaire
001038674 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)131693$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b1$$kFZJ
001038674 9101_ $$0I:(DE-HGF)0$$6P:(DE-Juel1)131693$$a HHU Düsseldorf$$b1
001038674 9131_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF4-525$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF4-520$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF4-500$$3G:(DE-HGF)POF4$$4G:(DE-HGF)POF$$9G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5252$$aDE-HGF$$bKey Technologies$$lNatural, Artificial and Cognitive Information Processing$$vDecoding Brain Organization and Dysfunction$$x0
001038674 9141_ $$y2024
001038674 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0200$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bSCOPUS$$d2025-01-06
001038674 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0160$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bEssential Science Indicators$$d2025-01-06
001038674 915__ $$0LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBY4$$2HGFVOC$$aCreative Commons Attribution CC BY 4.0
001038674 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0100$$2StatID$$aJCR$$bFRONT MED-LAUSANNE : 2022$$d2025-01-06
001038674 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0501$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bDOAJ Seal$$d2023-12-06T06:57:17Z
001038674 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0500$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bDOAJ$$d2023-12-06T06:57:17Z
001038674 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0113$$2StatID$$aWoS$$bScience Citation Index Expanded$$d2025-01-06
001038674 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0700$$2StatID$$aFees$$d2025-01-06
001038674 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0150$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bWeb of Science Core Collection$$d2025-01-06
001038674 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)9900$$2StatID$$aIF < 5$$d2025-01-06
001038674 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0510$$2StatID$$aOpenAccess
001038674 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0030$$2StatID$$aPeer Review$$bDOAJ : Anonymous peer review$$d2023-12-06T06:57:17Z
001038674 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0561$$2StatID$$aArticle Processing Charges$$d2025-01-06
001038674 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0300$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bMedline$$d2025-01-06
001038674 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1110$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bCurrent Contents - Clinical Medicine$$d2025-01-06
001038674 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0199$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bClarivate Analytics Master Journal List$$d2025-01-06
001038674 920__ $$lno
001038674 9201_ $$0I:(DE-Juel1)INM-7-20090406$$kINM-7$$lGehirn & Verhalten$$x0
001038674 980__ $$ajournal
001038674 980__ $$aVDB
001038674 980__ $$aUNRESTRICTED
001038674 980__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)INM-7-20090406
001038674 9801_ $$aFullTexts