001039466 001__ 1039466
001039466 005__ 20250804115238.0
001039466 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.1109/ISGTEUROPE62998.2024.10863645
001039466 0247_ $$2WOS$$aWOS:001451133800335
001039466 037__ $$aFZJ-2025-01760
001039466 1001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)187346$$aGlücker, Philipp$$b0$$eCorresponding author$$ufzj
001039466 1112_ $$a2024 IEEE PES Innovative Smart Grid Technologies Europe (ISGT EUROPE)$$cDubrovnik$$d2024-10-14 - 2024-10-17$$wCroatia
001039466 245__ $$aElectrical Storage Design in Multi-Energy Systems: Impact of Component Model Choice
001039466 260__ $$bIEEE$$c2024
001039466 300__ $$a1-5
001039466 3367_ $$2ORCID$$aCONFERENCE_PAPER
001039466 3367_ $$033$$2EndNote$$aConference Paper
001039466 3367_ $$2BibTeX$$aINPROCEEDINGS
001039466 3367_ $$2DRIVER$$aconferenceObject
001039466 3367_ $$2DataCite$$aOutput Types/Conference Paper
001039466 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)8$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aContribution to a conference proceedings$$bcontrib$$mcontrib$$s1739439941_4291
001039466 520__ $$aThe transition towards coupled energy sectorswithin multi-energy systems (MES) requires explicit modellingof more components and thus requires careful decisions on thelevel of modelling details. The focus commonly lies on one energysector, with strong simplifications for the remaining coupledenergy sectors. However, the impact of model choice on the MESplanning solution is largely unexplored. This work therefore setsout to investigate the impact of component model choice in anMES with electricity and heat for sizing a community batteryenergy storage system (BESS). Our analysis examines the impactof the choice of model of the power grid, the heating network, theheat pump, and the thermal building. Our results show a 49 %increase in BESS size when using the convex second-order coneformulation compared to the exact nonlinear AC OPF equationsfor the power grid. The linear formulation results in 58 %oversizing and suboptimal placement of the BESS. Furthermore,explicitly modelling the heating network does not significantlyimpact the design results but increases the computational efforts.Different heat pump models show minimum impact on the BESSdesign and location, thus our findings suggest that linear modelsfor the heat pump are suitable. However, omitting thermaldemand and storage capabilities overestimates the BESS sizeby 42 %. This further emphasizes the necessity of explicitlymodelling the coupled heating sector and its thermal inertia forrealistic electrical storage designs.
001039466 536__ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF4-1122$$a1122 - Design, Operation and Digitalization of the Future Energy Grids (POF4-112)$$cPOF4-112$$fPOF IV$$x0
001039466 588__ $$aDataset connected to CrossRef Conference
001039466 7001_ $$aMhanna, Sleiman$$b1
001039466 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)142000$$aPesch, Thiemo$$b2$$ufzj
001039466 7001_ $$aMancarella, Pierluigi$$b3
001039466 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)179029$$aBenigni, Andrea$$b4$$ufzj
001039466 773__ $$a10.1109/ISGTEUROPE62998.2024.10863645
001039466 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/1039466/files/Electrical_Storage_Design_in_Multi-Energy_Systems_Impact_of_Component_Model_Choice.pdf$$yRestricted
001039466 909CO $$ooai:juser.fz-juelich.de:1039466$$pVDB
001039466 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)187346$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b0$$kFZJ
001039466 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)142000$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b2$$kFZJ
001039466 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)179029$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b4$$kFZJ
001039466 9131_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF4-112$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF4-110$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF4-100$$3G:(DE-HGF)POF4$$4G:(DE-HGF)POF$$9G:(DE-HGF)POF4-1122$$aDE-HGF$$bForschungsbereich Energie$$lEnergiesystemdesign (ESD)$$vDigitalisierung und Systemtechnik$$x0
001039466 9141_ $$y2024
001039466 920__ $$lyes
001039466 9201_ $$0I:(DE-Juel1)ICE-1-20170217$$kICE-1$$lModellierung von Energiesystemen$$x0
001039466 980__ $$acontrib
001039466 980__ $$aVDB
001039466 980__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)ICE-1-20170217
001039466 980__ $$aUNRESTRICTED