Hauptseite > Publikationsdatenbank > Electrical Storage Design in Multi-Energy Systems: Impact of Component Model Choice > print

001     1039466
005     20250804115238.0
024 7 _ |a 10.1109/ISGTEUROPE62998.2024.10863645
|2 doi
024 7 _ |a WOS:001451133800335
|2 WOS
037 _ _ |a FZJ-2025-01760
100 1 _ |a Glücker, Philipp
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)187346
|b 0
|e Corresponding author
|u fzj
111 2 _ |a 2024 IEEE PES Innovative Smart Grid Technologies Europe (ISGT EUROPE)
|c Dubrovnik
|d 2024-10-14 - 2024-10-17
|w Croatia
245 _ _ |a Electrical Storage Design in Multi-Energy Systems: Impact of Component Model Choice
260 _ _ |c 2024
|b IEEE
300 _ _ |a 1-5
336 7 _ |a CONFERENCE_PAPER
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a Conference Paper
|0 33
|2 EndNote
336 7 _ |a INPROCEEDINGS
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a conferenceObject
|2 DRIVER
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Conference Paper
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Contribution to a conference proceedings
|b contrib
|m contrib
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)8
|s 1739439941_4291
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
520 _ _ |a The transition towards coupled energy sectorswithin multi-energy systems (MES) requires explicit modellingof more components and thus requires careful decisions on thelevel of modelling details. The focus commonly lies on one energysector, with strong simplifications for the remaining coupledenergy sectors. However, the impact of model choice on the MESplanning solution is largely unexplored. This work therefore setsout to investigate the impact of component model choice in anMES with electricity and heat for sizing a community batteryenergy storage system (BESS). Our analysis examines the impactof the choice of model of the power grid, the heating network, theheat pump, and the thermal building. Our results show a 49 %increase in BESS size when using the convex second-order coneformulation compared to the exact nonlinear AC OPF equationsfor the power grid. The linear formulation results in 58 %oversizing and suboptimal placement of the BESS. Furthermore,explicitly modelling the heating network does not significantlyimpact the design results but increases the computational efforts.Different heat pump models show minimum impact on the BESSdesign and location, thus our findings suggest that linear modelsfor the heat pump are suitable. However, omitting thermaldemand and storage capabilities overestimates the BESS sizeby 42 %. This further emphasizes the necessity of explicitlymodelling the coupled heating sector and its thermal inertia forrealistic electrical storage designs.
536 _ _ |a 1122 - Design, Operation and Digitalization of the Future Energy Grids (POF4-112)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-1122
|c POF4-112
|f POF IV
|x 0
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to CrossRef Conference
700 1 _ |a Mhanna, Sleiman
|b 1
700 1 _ |a Pesch, Thiemo
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)142000
|b 2
|u fzj
700 1 _ |a Mancarella, Pierluigi
|b 3
700 1 _ |a Benigni, Andrea
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)179029
|b 4
|u fzj
773 _ _ |a 10.1109/ISGTEUROPE62998.2024.10863645
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/1039466/files/Electrical_Storage_Design_in_Multi-Energy_Systems_Impact_of_Component_Model_Choice.pdf
|y Restricted
909 C O |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:1039466
|p VDB
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 0
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)187346
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 2
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)142000
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 4
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)179029
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|b Forschungsbereich Energie
|l Energiesystemdesign (ESD)
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-110
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-112
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF4
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-100
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|v Digitalisierung und Systemtechnik
|9 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-1122
|x 0
914 1 _ |y 2024
920 _ _ |l yes
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)ICE-1-20170217
|k ICE-1
|l Modellierung von Energiesystemen
|x 0
980 _ _ |a contrib
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)ICE-1-20170217
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED

LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21