% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Breteler:1040923,
author = {Breteler, Martine J. M. and Leigard, Ellen and Hartung,
Lisa C. and Welch, John R. and Brealey, David A. and
Fritsch, Sebastian J. and Konrad, David and Hertzberg,
Daniel and Bell, Max and Rienstra, Heleen and Rademakers,
Frank E. and Kalkman, Cor J.},
title = {{R}eliability of an all-in-one wearable sensor for
continuous vital signs monitoring in high-risk patients: the
{NIGHTINGALE} clinical validation study},
journal = {Journal of clinical monitoring and computing},
volume = {39},
issn = {0748-1977},
address = {Dordrecht [u.a.]},
publisher = {Springer Science + Business Media B.V.},
reportid = {FZJ-2025-02053},
pages = {1087–1100},
year = {2025},
abstract = {Continuous vital signs monitoring with wearable systems may
improve early recognition of patient deterioration on
hospital wards. The objective of this study was to determine
whether the wearable Checkpoint Cardio’s CPC12S, can
accurately measure heart rate (HR), respiratory rate (RR),
oxygen saturation (SpO2), blood pressure (BP) and
temperature continuously. In an observational multicenter
method comparison study of 70 high-risk surgical patients
admitted to high-dependency wards; HR, RR, SpO2, BP and
temperature were simultaneously measured with the CPC12S
system and with ICU-grade monitoring systems in four
European hospitals. Outcome measures were bias and $95\%$
limits of agreement (LoA). Clinical accuracy was assessed
with Clarke Error Grid analyses for HR and RR. A total of
3,212 h of vital signs data (on average 26 h per patient)
were analyzed. For HR, bias $(95\%$ LoA) of the pooled
analysis was 0.0 (-3.5 to 3.4), for RR 1.5 (-3.7 to 7.5) and
for SpO2 0.4 (-3.1 to 4.0). The CPC12S system overestimated
BP, with a bias of 8.9 and wide LoA (-23.3 to 41.2).
Temperature was underestimated with a bias of -0.6 and LoA
of -1.7 to 0.6. Clarke Error Grid analyses showed that
adequate treatment decisions regarding changes in HR and RR
would have been made in $99.2\%$ and $92.0\%$ of cases
respectively. The CPC12S system showed high accuracy for
measurements of HR. The accuracy of RR, SpO2 were slightly
overestimated and core temperature underestimated, with LoA
outside the predefined clinical acceptable range. The
accuracy of BP was unacceptably low.},
cin = {JSC / CASA},
ddc = {610},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)JSC-20090406 / I:(DE-Juel1)CASA-20230315},
pnm = {5112 - Cross-Domain Algorithms, Tools, Methods Labs (ATMLs)
and Research Groups (POF4-511) / SDI-S - SDI-S: Smart Data
Innovation Services - Experimentelle Erprobung und
Entwicklung von KI-Dienstverbünden für Innovationen auf
industriellen Daten (01IS22095D) / NIGHTINGALE - Connecting
Patients and Carers using wearable sensor technology
(727534)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5112 / G:(BMBF)01IS22095D /
G:(EU-Grant)727534},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {40100556},
UT = {WOS:001448808900001},
doi = {10.1007/s10877-025-01279-x},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/1040923},
}