% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Ness:1040966,
author = {Ness, Torbjørn V. and Tetzlaff, Tom and Einevoll, Gaute T.
and Dahmen, David},
title = {{O}n the validity of electric brain signal predictions
based on population firing rates},
journal = {PLoS Computational Biology},
volume = {21},
number = {4},
issn = {1553-734X},
address = {San Francisco, Calif.},
publisher = {Public Library of Science},
reportid = {FZJ-2025-02088},
pages = {e1012303},
year = {2025},
abstract = {Neural activity at the population level is commonly studied
experimentally through measurements of electric brain
signals like local field potentials (LFPs), or
electroencephalography (EEG) signals. To allow for
comparison between observed and simulated neural activity it
is therefore important that simulations of neural activity
can accurately predict these brain signals. Simulations of
neural activity at the population level often rely on
point-neuron network models or firing-rate models. While
these simplified representations of neural activity are
computationally efficient, they lack the explicit spatial
information needed for calculating LFP/EEG signals.
Different heuristic approaches have been suggested for
overcoming this limitation, but the accuracy of these
approaches has not fully been assessed. One such heuristic
approach, the so-called kernel method, has previously been
applied with promising results and has the additional
advantage of being well-grounded in the biophysics
underlying electric brain signal generation. It is based on
calculating rate-to-LFP/EEG kernels for each synaptic
pathway in a network model, after which LFP/EEG signals can
be obtained directly from population firing rates. This
amounts to a massive reduction in the computational effort
of calculating brain signals because the brain signals are
calculated for each population instead of for each neuron.
Here, we investigate how and when the kernel method can be
expected to work, and present a theoretical framework for
predicting its accuracy. We show that the relative error of
the brain signal predictions is a function of the
single-cell kernel heterogeneity and the spike-train
correlations. Finally, we demonstrate that the kernel method
is most accurate for contributions which are also dominating
the brain signals: spatially clustered and correlated
synaptic input to large populations of pyramidal cells. We
thereby further establish the kernel method as a promising
approach for calculating electric brain signals from
large-scale neural simulations.},
cin = {IAS-6},
ddc = {610},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)IAS-6-20130828},
pnm = {5231 - Neuroscientific Foundations (POF4-523) / 5232 -
Computational Principles (POF4-523) / HBP SGA3 - Human Brain
Project Specific Grant Agreement 3 (945539) / ACA - Advanced
Computing Architectures (SO-092) / MetaMoSim - Generic
metadata management for reproducible
high-performance-computing simulation workflows - MetaMoSim
(ZT-I-PF-3-026) / DFG project G:(GEPRIS)491111487 -
Open-Access-Publikationskosten / 2025 - 2027 /
Forschungszentrum Jülich (OAPKFZJ) (491111487)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5231 / G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5232 /
G:(EU-Grant)945539 / G:(DE-HGF)SO-092 /
G:(DE-Juel-1)ZT-I-PF-3-026 / G:(GEPRIS)491111487},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {40228210},
UT = {WOS:001466754000003},
doi = {10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012303},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/1040966},
}