001     10411
005     20200423202758.0
024 7 _ |2 pmid
|a pmid:21389005
024 7 _ |2 DOI
|a 10.1093/treephys/tpq106
024 7 _ |2 WOS
|a WOS:000288272100010
037 _ _ |a PreJuSER-10411
041 _ _ |a eng
082 _ _ |a 630
084 _ _ |2 WoS
|a Forestry
100 1 _ |0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|a Nieves, M.
|b 0
245 _ _ |a Leaf nitrogen productivity is the major factor behind the growth reduction by long term salt stress
260 _ _ |a Victoria, BC
|b Heron
|c 2011
300 _ _ |a 92 - 101
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
440 _ 0 |0 16581
|a Tree Physiology
|v 31
|x 0829-318X
|y 1
500 _ _ |a This work was supported by CDTI Project (IDI-20070868).
520 _ _ |a Plant growth response to salinity on a scale of years has not been studied in terms of growth analysis. To gain insights into this topic, 2-year-old Mediterranean Fan Palm (Chamaerops humilis L.) and Mexican Fan Palm (Washingtonia robusta H. Wendl) seedlings, each with its own distinct plant morphology, were grown for 2 years in a peat soil and irrigated with water of 2 dS m(-1) (control) or 8 dS m(-1) (saline). Plants were harvested on seven occasions and the time trends in relative growth rate (RGR, the rate of increase of biomass per unit of biomass already existing) and its components were analysed. In the long term, salinity produced a slight reduction in the mean RGR, values in both species. In the short term, salinity caused a reduction in RGR. However, during the second year, plants irrigated with 8 dS m(-1) grew somewhat more quickly than the control plants, probably as a result of delay in the growth kinetics due to salinity. Regarding RGR components, leaf nitrogen productivity (the rate of biomass gain per unit leaf N and time) was the major factor causing the differences in RGR resulting from salinity. Washingtonia robusta showed a relatively high plasticity in plant morphology by increasing root and decreasing stem biomass allocation in the presence of salinity. However, the long-term response of W. robusta to salinity, based to a great extent, on this morphological plasticity, was less effective than that of C. humilis, which is based mainly on the contribution of leaf N to RGR values.
536 _ _ |0 G:(DE-Juel1)FUEK407
|2 G:(DE-HGF)
|a Terrestrische Umwelt
|c P24
|x 0
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to Web of Science, Pubmed
650 _ 2 |2 MeSH
|a Arecaceae: drug effects
650 _ 2 |2 MeSH
|a Arecaceae: growth & development
650 _ 2 |2 MeSH
|a Arecaceae: physiology
650 _ 2 |2 MeSH
|a Biomass
650 _ 2 |2 MeSH
|a Nitrogen: analysis
650 _ 2 |2 MeSH
|a Nitrogen: metabolism
650 _ 2 |2 MeSH
|a Plant Leaves: drug effects
650 _ 2 |2 MeSH
|a Plant Leaves: growth & development
650 _ 2 |2 MeSH
|a Plant Leaves: physiology
650 _ 2 |2 MeSH
|a Plant Roots: drug effects
650 _ 2 |2 MeSH
|a Plant Roots: growth & development
650 _ 2 |2 MeSH
|a Plant Roots: physiology
650 _ 2 |2 MeSH
|a Plant Stems: drug effects
650 _ 2 |2 MeSH
|a Plant Stems: growth & development
650 _ 2 |2 MeSH
|a Plant Stems: physiology
650 _ 2 |2 MeSH
|a Salinity
650 _ 2 |2 MeSH
|a Seedling: drug effects
650 _ 2 |2 MeSH
|a Seedling: growth & development
650 _ 2 |2 MeSH
|a Seedling: physiology
650 _ 2 |2 MeSH
|a Sodium Chloride: pharmacology
650 _ 2 |2 MeSH
|a Spain
650 _ 2 |2 MeSH
|a Stress, Physiological
650 _ 2 |2 MeSH
|a Time Factors
650 _ 2 |2 MeSH
|a Water: metabolism
650 _ 7 |0 7647-14-5
|2 NLM Chemicals
|a Sodium Chloride
650 _ 7 |0 7727-37-9
|2 NLM Chemicals
|a Nitrogen
650 _ 7 |0 7732-18-5
|2 NLM Chemicals
|a Water
650 _ 7 |2 WoSType
|a J
653 2 0 |2 Author
|a biomass allocation
653 2 0 |2 Author
|a Chamaerops humilis
653 2 0 |2 Author
|a growth analysis
653 2 0 |2 Author
|a Richards function
653 2 0 |2 Author
|a Washingtonia robusta
700 1 _ |0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|a Nieves-Cordones, M.
|b 1
700 1 _ |0 P:(DE-Juel1)129384
|a Poorter, H.
|b 2
|u FZJ
700 1 _ |0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|a Simón, M.D.
|b 3
773 _ _ |0 PERI:(DE-600)1473475-8
|a 10.1093/treephys/tpq106
|g Vol. 31, p. 92 - 101
|p 92 - 101
|q 31<92 - 101
|t Tree physiology
|v 31
|x 0829-318X
|y 2011
856 7 _ |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/treephys/tpq106
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/10411/files/FZJ-10411.pdf
|z Published final document.
|y Restricted
909 C O |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:10411
|p VDB
913 1 _ |0 G:(DE-Juel1)FUEK407
|a DE-HGF
|b Erde und Umwelt
|k P24
|l Terrestrische Umwelt
|v Terrestrische Umwelt
|x 0
913 2 _ |0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-582
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-580
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-500
|a DE-HGF
|b Key Technologies
|l Key Technologies for the Bioeconomy
|v Plant Science
|x 0
914 1 _ |y 2011
915 _ _ |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0010
|a JCR/ISI refereed
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-2-20101118
|g IBG
|k IBG-2
|l Pflanzenwissenschaften
|x 1
970 _ _ |a VDB:(DE-Juel1)120722
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a ConvertedRecord
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-2-20101118
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED


LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21