Home > Publications database > From hydraulic root architecture models to efficient macroscopic sink terms including perirhizal resistance: quantifying accuracy and computational speed > print

001     1041117
005     20250414120443.0
024 7 _ |a 10.5194/hess-29-1759-2025
|2 doi
024 7 _ |a 1027-5606
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 1607-7938
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 10.34734/FZJ-2025-02151
|2 datacite_doi
024 7 _ |a WOS:001454622300001
|2 WOS
037 _ _ |a FZJ-2025-02151
082 _ _ |a 550
100 1 _ |a Leitner, Daniel
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)187335
|b 0
|e Corresponding author
245 _ _ |a From hydraulic root architecture models to efficient macroscopic sink terms including perirhizal resistance: quantifying accuracy and computational speed
260 _ _ |a Munich
|c 2025
|b EGU
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|b journal
|m journal
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|s 1744266581_6844
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
520 _ _ |a Root water uptake strongly affects soil water balance and plant development. It can be described by mechanistic models of soil–root hydraulics based on soil water content, soil and root hydraulic properties, and the dynamic development of the root architecture. Recently, novel upscaling methods have emerged, which enable the application of detailed mechanistic models on a larger scale, particularly for land surface and crop models, by using mathematical upscaling.In this study, we explore the underlying assumptions and the mathematical fundamentals of different upscaling approaches. Our analysis rigorously investigates the errors introduced in each step during the transition from fine-scale mechanistic models, which considers the nonlinear perirhizal resistance around each root, to more macroscopic representations. Upscaling steps simplify the representation of the root architecture, the perirhizal geometry, and the soil spatial dimension and thus introduces errors compared to the full complex 3D simulations. In order to investigate the extent of these errors, we perform simulation case studies, spring barley as a representative non-row crop and maize as a representative row crop, using three different soils.We show that the error introduced by the upscaling steps strongly differs, depending on root architecture and soil type. Furthermore, we identify the individual steps and assumptions that lead to the most important losses in accuracy. An analysis of the trade-off between model complexity and accuracy provides valuable guidance for selecting the most suitable approach for specific applications.
536 _ _ |a 2173 - Agro-biogeosystems: controls, feedbacks and impact (POF4-217)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-2173
|c POF4-217
|f POF IV
|x 0
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to CrossRef, Journals: juser.fz-juelich.de
700 1 _ |a Schnepf, Andrea
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)157922
|b 1
700 1 _ |a Vanderborght, Jan
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)129548
|b 2
773 _ _ |a 10.5194/hess-29-1759-2025
|g Vol. 29, no. 6, p. 1759 - 1782
|0 PERI:(DE-600)2100610-6
|n 6
|p 1759 - 1782
|t Hydrology and earth system sciences
|v 29
|y 2025
|x 1027-5606
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/1041117/files/Invoice_Helmholtz-PUC-2025-39.pdf
856 4 _ |y OpenAccess
|u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/1041117/files/hess-29-1759-2025.pdf
909 C O |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:1041117
|p openaire
|p open_access
|p OpenAPC
|p driver
|p VDB
|p openCost
|p dnbdelivery
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 0
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)187335
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 1
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)157922
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 2
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)129548
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|b Forschungsbereich Erde und Umwelt
|l Erde im Wandel – Unsere Zukunft nachhaltig gestalten
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-210
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-217
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF4
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-200
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|v Für eine nachhaltige Bio-Ökonomie – von Ressourcen zu Produkten
|9 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-2173
|x 0
914 1 _ |y 2025
915 p c |a APC keys set
|0 PC:(DE-HGF)0000
|2 APC
915 p c |a Local Funding
|0 PC:(DE-HGF)0001
|2 APC
915 p c |a DFG OA Publikationskosten
|0 PC:(DE-HGF)0002
|2 APC
915 p c |a DOAJ Journal
|0 PC:(DE-HGF)0003
|2 APC
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200
|2 StatID
|b SCOPUS
|d 2024-12-19
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0160
|2 StatID
|b Essential Science Indicators
|d 2024-12-19
915 _ _ |a Creative Commons Attribution CC BY 4.0
|0 LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBY4
|2 HGFVOC
915 _ _ |a JCR
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100
|2 StatID
|b HYDROL EARTH SYST SC : 2022
|d 2024-12-19
915 _ _ |a IF >= 5
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)9905
|2 StatID
|b HYDROL EARTH SYST SC : 2022
|d 2024-12-19
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0501
|2 StatID
|b DOAJ Seal
|d 2022-12-20T09:33:05Z
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0500
|2 StatID
|b DOAJ
|d 2022-12-20T09:33:05Z
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0113
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index Expanded
|d 2024-12-19
915 _ _ |a Fees
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0700
|2 StatID
|d 2024-12-19
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150
|2 StatID
|b Web of Science Core Collection
|d 2024-12-19
915 _ _ |a OpenAccess
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0510
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a Peer Review
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0030
|2 StatID
|b DOAJ : Open peer review
|d 2022-12-20T09:33:05Z
915 _ _ |a Article Processing Charges
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0561
|2 StatID
|d 2024-12-19
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1150
|2 StatID
|b Current Contents - Physical, Chemical and Earth Sciences
|d 2024-12-19
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300
|2 StatID
|b Medline
|d 2024-12-19
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199
|2 StatID
|b Clarivate Analytics Master Journal List
|d 2024-12-19
920 _ _ |l yes
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118
|k IBG-3
|l Agrosphäre
|x 0
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118
980 _ _ |a APC
980 1 _ |a APC
980 1 _ |a FullTexts

LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21