% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{Uddin:1042400,
      author       = {Uddin, M. Shuza and Spahn, Ingo and Basunia, M. Shamsuzzoha
                      and Voyles, Andrew S. and Spellerberg, Stefan and Hussain,
                      Mazhar and Sudár, Sándor and Bernstein, Lee A. and
                      Neumaier, Bernd and Qaim, Syed M.},
      title        = {{A}n overview of production routes of the non-standard
                      positron emitter 86g{Y} with emphasis on a comparative
                      analysis of the 86{S}r(p,n)- and 86{S}r(d,2n)-reactions},
      journal      = {Radiochimica acta},
      volume       = {113},
      number       = {5},
      issn         = {0033-8230},
      address      = {Berlin},
      publisher    = {De Gruyter},
      reportid     = {FZJ-2025-02554},
      pages        = {345 - 351},
      year         = {2025},
      abstract     = {A very brief overview of the hitherto investigated
                      production routes of 86gY is given, and a comparative
                      analysis of its production via the two low-energy reactions,
                      namely (p,n) and (d,2n) on $96.4\%$ enriched 86Sr as target
                      material, is presented. Based on our recent cross- section
                      measurements, the calculated yields of 86gY via the two
                      reactions were compared, and the levels of co-produced
                      isotopic impurities were estimated. At low-energy medical
                      cyclotrons (Ep < 20 MeV; Ed <10 MeV) the use of the (p, n)
                      reaction is superior, both in terms of the yield of 86gY and
                      the levels of radionuclidic impurities. At medium-sized
                      cyclotrons, on the other hand, the (d, 2n) reaction leads to
                      higher yield of 86gY, but the level of radionuclidic
                      impurities is also higher. The method of choice for
                      production of 86gY thus remains the (p,n) reaction on
                      enriched 86Sr.},
      cin          = {INM-5},
      ddc          = {610},
      cid          = {I:(DE-Juel1)INM-5-20090406},
      pnm          = {5253 - Neuroimaging (POF4-525)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5253},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      UT           = {WOS:001442433300001},
      doi          = {10.1515/ract-2024-0375},
      url          = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/1042400},
}