% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{Truong:1042710,
      author       = {Truong, Thao Kim and Whang, Grace and Huang, Jake and
                      Sandoval, Stephanie Elizabeth and Zeier, Wolfgang},
      title        = {{P}robing solid-state battery aging: evaluating calendar
                      vs. cycle aging protocols via time-resolved electrochemical
                      impedance spectroscopy},
      journal      = {Journal of materials chemistry / A},
      volume       = {13},
      issn         = {2050-7488},
      address      = {London ˜[u.a.]œ},
      publisher    = {RSC},
      reportid     = {FZJ-2025-02656},
      pages        = {17261},
      year         = {2025},
      note         = {financial support from ProRec project funded by the
                      Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (BMBF, project
                      03XP0537A)},
      abstract     = {Understanding battery aging mechanisms is critical towards
                      identifying and improving upon performance bottlenecks.
                      Aging protocols which can quickly identify and monitor
                      degradation of cells can help expedite solid-state battery
                      development by predicting the possible long-term aging trend
                      of cells in a time efficient manner. In this work, the
                      degradation behavior of
                      $In/InLi|Li_6PS_5Cl|NCM83:Li_6PS_5Cl$ cells was investigated
                      using two different accelerated aging protocols: (1)
                      calendar aging and (2) cycle aging. Cells with various
                      cut-off potentials were investigated using the two aging
                      protocols showing significantly greater performance
                      deterioration under calendar aging relative to cycle aging.
                      Applying distribution of relaxation times analyses obtained
                      from impedance spectroscopy, the cathode–electrolyte
                      interfacial resistance evolution is found to be the dominant
                      degradation mechanism during calendar aging while changes at
                      the anode–electrolyte interface are influential during
                      cycle aging tests. The aging protocol and analyses applied
                      in this work can potentially be further extended to other
                      systems to help understand degradation processes and quickly
                      screen cells for optimization.},
      cin          = {IMD-4},
      ddc          = {530},
      cid          = {I:(DE-Juel1)IMD-4-20141217},
      pnm          = {1222 - Components and Cells (POF4-122)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-1222},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      UT           = {WOS:001490255900001},
      doi          = {10.1039/D5TA01083G},
      url          = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/1042710},
}