% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@INPROCEEDINGS{Maksumov:1042994,
author = {Maksumov, Muzaffar and Hausen, Florian},
collaboration = {Kaus, Anton and Teng, Zhenjie and Kleiner, Karin and
Gunkel, Felix and Eichel, Rüdiger-A.},
title = {{D}ynamic and static degradation of perovskite oxide
catalysts by electrochemical {AFM}},
reportid = {FZJ-2025-02721},
year = {2025},
abstract = {A fundamental understanding of degradation mechanisms under
static and dynamic conditions is essential to develop
catalysts for the oxygen evolution reaction (OER), the
bottleneck in efficient electrochemical water splitting.
Perovskite oxides are novel class of OER electrocatalysts
[1-2], however, the differences in their degradation and
stability in alkaline electrolyte are not yet fully
understood. To address this, epitaxially grown
La0.6Sr0.4CoO3 (LSCO), La0.6Sr0.4FeO3 (LSFO) and
La0.6Sr0.4MnO3 (LSMO) were compared by employing
electrochemical atomic force microscopy (AFM) during cyclic
voltammetry (CV) and chronoamperometry (CA).Electrochemical
AFM results, mapping the topography and friction force of
materials during the first CV showed distinctly different
and irreversible degradation paths for perovskites.
Continuous topography and friction force measurements over
prolonged cycling, as well as post-catalysis analyses,
further supported the observed dynamic degradation
mechanisms, specifically bulk degradation in LSCO and LSMO,
and surface passivation in LSFO. Consequently, the Co-based
perovskite exhibited reduced stability and activity loss,
whereas the Fe-based perovskite demonstrated improved
stability. A comparison with steady-state OER conditions
showed that electrochemical AFM during CA detected a short
delay of morphology and friction force changes relative to
the start of electrochemistry. The results elucidate how
electrochemical AFM can differentiate degradation mechanisms
under dynamic and static conditions in alkaline environments
as well as between transition metals in perovskite oxides.
Thereby, the conclusions contribute significantly to the
understanding of perovskite degradation at the solid-liquid
interface. References:[1] Weber, M., Gunkel, F. et al. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 2022, 144, 17966-17979 [2] Akbashew, A. et
al., Energy Environ. Sci., 2023, 16, 513-522},
month = {May},
date = {2025-05-26},
organization = {10th Multifrequency AFM, Madrid
(Spain), 26 May 2025 - 30 May 2025},
subtyp = {Other},
cin = {IET-1},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)IET-1-20110218},
pnm = {1223 - Batteries in Application (POF4-122) / DFG project
G:(GEPRIS)493705276 - Kontrolle des Degradationsverhaltens
von perowskitischen OER-Katalysatoren unter dynamischen
Operationsbedingungen durch operando-Charakterisierung und
systematischer Variation der d-Orbital-Bandstruktur
(493705276)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-1223 / G:(GEPRIS)493705276},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)24},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/1042994},
}