001     1043178
005     20250820202246.0
024 7 _ |a 10.1002/smtd.202401670
|2 doi
024 7 _ |a 10.34734/FZJ-2025-02786
|2 datacite_doi
024 7 _ |a 40434187
|2 pmid
024 7 _ |a WOS:001497383200001
|2 WOS
037 _ _ |a FZJ-2025-02786
082 _ _ |a 620
100 1 _ |a Fricke, Sebastian
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)188198
|b 0
245 _ _ |a Introducing an Experimental Route to Identify and Unify Lab‐Scale Redox‐Flow Battery Cell Performances via Molar Fluxes and Cell Constants
260 _ _ |a Weinheim
|c 2025
|b WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|b journal
|m journal
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|s 1749717389_7812
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
500 _ _ |a This research was funded by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research and by the Ministry of Arts and Science of the state of North Rhine-Westphalia in the framework of the core funding for Jülich Research Centre.
520 _ _ |a Redox flow batteries (RFBs) are a promising technology for grid energy storage based on their high potential for scalability, design flexibility, high efficiency, and long durability, hence great effort has been invested in this area of research. However, due to the large differences in lab-scale RFB cell design and construction as well their operational performance, fundamental studies on innovative RFB components (e.g., active materials, separators, additives) compare poorly due to the lack of standard setups, settings, and procedures. This work introduces an experimental calibration route for aqueous as well as nonaqueous RFBs based on a simple mass transport model using molar fluxes, enabling one to compare dissimilar lab-scale RFB cell setups by introducing several RFB parameters: First, K1, which summarizes the operating parameters of an RFB to identify the critical ratio (K1critical) needed for efficient charge–discharge cycling using a simple overvoltage and charge efficiency evaluation; second, the RFB cell constant ζ, quantifying the influence of a lab-scale RFB setup on its performance; and finally, K2, ultimately enabling full comparison of (idealized) K1critical operating parameters across RFB cell setups.
536 _ _ |a 1221 - Fundamentals and Materials (POF4-122)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-1221
|c POF4-122
|f POF IV
|x 0
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to CrossRef, Journals: juser.fz-juelich.de
700 1 _ |a Kortekaas, Luuk
|b 1
700 1 _ |a Winter, Martin
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)166130
|b 2
700 1 _ |a Grünebaum, Mariano
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)166392
|b 3
|e Corresponding author
773 _ _ |a 10.1002/smtd.202401670
|g p. 2401670
|0 PERI:(DE-600)2884448-8
|p 2401670
|t Small Methods
|v 2401670
|y 2025
|x 2366-9608
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/1043178/files/Small%20Methods%20-%202025%20-%20Fricke%20-%20Introducing%20an%20Experimental%20Route%20to%20Identify%20and%20Unify%20Lab%E2%80%90Scale%20Redox%E2%80%90Flow%20Battery%20Cell-1.pdf
|y OpenAccess
909 C O |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:1043178
|p openaire
|p open_access
|p OpenAPC_DEAL
|p driver
|p VDB
|p openCost
|p dnbdelivery
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 0
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)188198
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 2
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)166130
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 3
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)166392
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|b Forschungsbereich Energie
|l Materialien und Technologien für die Energiewende (MTET)
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-120
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-122
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF4
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-100
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|v Elektrochemische Energiespeicherung
|9 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-1221
|x 0
914 1 _ |y 2025
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200
|2 StatID
|b SCOPUS
|d 2024-12-18
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0160
|2 StatID
|b Essential Science Indicators
|d 2024-12-18
915 _ _ |a Creative Commons Attribution CC BY 4.0
|0 LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBY4
|2 HGFVOC
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0600
|2 StatID
|b Ebsco Academic Search
|d 2024-12-18
915 _ _ |a JCR
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100
|2 StatID
|b SMALL METHODS : 2022
|d 2024-12-18
915 _ _ |a DEAL Wiley
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)3001
|2 StatID
|d 2024-12-18
|w ger
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0113
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index Expanded
|d 2024-12-18
915 _ _ |a IF >= 10
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)9910
|2 StatID
|b SMALL METHODS : 2022
|d 2024-12-18
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150
|2 StatID
|b Web of Science Core Collection
|d 2024-12-18
915 _ _ |a OpenAccess
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0510
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a Peer Review
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0030
|2 StatID
|b ASC
|d 2024-12-18
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1150
|2 StatID
|b Current Contents - Physical, Chemical and Earth Sciences
|d 2024-12-18
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300
|2 StatID
|b Medline
|d 2024-12-18
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199
|2 StatID
|b Clarivate Analytics Master Journal List
|d 2024-12-18
915 p c |a APC keys set
|2 APC
|0 PC:(DE-HGF)0000
915 p c |a Local Funding
|2 APC
|0 PC:(DE-HGF)0001
915 p c |a DFG OA Publikationskosten
|2 APC
|0 PC:(DE-HGF)0002
915 p c |a DEAL: Wiley 2019
|2 APC
|0 PC:(DE-HGF)0120
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)IMD-4-20141217
|k IMD-4
|l Helmholtz-Institut Münster Ionenleiter für Energiespeicher
|x 0
980 1 _ |a FullTexts
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)IMD-4-20141217
980 _ _ |a APC


LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21