Gast ::
| Hauptseite > Publikationsdatenbank > Optimized step size control within the Rosenbrock solvers for stiff chemical ordinary differential equation systems in KPP version 2.2.3_rs4 > print |
| Hauptseite > Publikationsdatenbank > Optimized step size control within the Rosenbrock solvers for stiff chemical ordinary differential equation systems in KPP version 2.2.3_rs4 > print |
| 001 | 1044264 | ||
| 005 | 20251007202032.0 | ||
| 024 | 7 | _ | |a 10.5194/gmd-18-4273-2025 |2 doi |
| 024 | 7 | _ | |a 1991-959X |2 ISSN |
| 024 | 7 | _ | |a 1991-9603 |2 ISSN |
| 024 | 7 | _ | |a 10.34734/FZJ-2025-03134 |2 datacite_doi |
| 037 | _ | _ | |a FZJ-2025-03134 |
| 082 | _ | _ | |a 550 |
| 100 | 1 | _ | |a Dreger, Raphael |0 P:(DE-Juel1)179383 |b 0 |e Corresponding author |
| 245 | _ | _ | |a Optimized step size control within the Rosenbrock solvers for stiff chemical ordinary differential equation systems in KPP version 2.2.3_rs4 |
| 260 | _ | _ | |a Katlenburg-Lindau |c 2025 |b Copernicus |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a article |2 DRIVER |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a Output Types/Journal article |2 DataCite |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a Journal Article |b journal |m journal |0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16 |s 1759825646_8870 |2 PUB:(DE-HGF) |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a ARTICLE |2 BibTeX |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE |2 ORCID |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a Journal Article |0 0 |2 EndNote |
| 520 | _ | _ | |a Numerical integration of multiphase chemical kinetics in atmospheric models is challenging. The underlying system of ordinary differential equations (ODEs) is stiff and thus difficult to solve. Rosenbrock solvers are a popular choice for such tasks. These solvers provide the desired stability and accuracy of results at an affordable yet large computational cost. The latter is crucially dependent on the efficiency of the step size control. Our analysis indicates that the local error, which is the key factor for the step size selection, is often overestimated, leading to very small substeps. In this study, we optimized the first-order step size controller most commonly employed in Rosenbrock solvers. Furthermore, we compared its efficiency to a second-order step size controller. We assessed the performance of the controllers in both a box and a global model for very stiff ODEs. Significant reductions in the computation time were accomplished with only marginal deviations in the results compared to the standard first-order controller. This was achieved not only for gas-phase chemistry but also for the more complex aqueous-phase chemistry in cloud droplets and deliquescent aerosols. Depending on the selected chemical mechanism, significant improvements were already achieved by simply adjusting heuristic parameters of the default controller. However, especially for the global model, the best results were achieved with the second-order controller, which reduced the number of function evaluations by 43 %, 27 % and 13 % for gas-phase, cloud and aerosol chemistry, respectively. The overall computational time was reduced by over 11 % while requiring only minimal adjustments to the original code. Analysis of a 1-year integration period showed that with the second-order controller, the deviations from the reference simulation stay below 1 % for the main tropospheric oxidants. The results presented here show the possibility of more efficient atmospheric chemistry simulations without compromising accuracy. |
| 536 | _ | _ | |a 2111 - Air Quality (POF4-211) |0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-2111 |c POF4-211 |f POF IV |x 0 |
| 588 | _ | _ | |a Dataset connected to CrossRef, Journals: juser.fz-juelich.de |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Kirfel, Timo |0 P:(DE-Juel1)164446 |b 1 |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Pozzer, Andrea |0 P:(DE-HGF)0 |b 2 |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Rosanka, Simon |0 P:(DE-Juel1)173788 |b 3 |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Sander, Rolf |0 P:(DE-Juel1)180928 |b 4 |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Taraborrelli, Domenico |0 P:(DE-Juel1)167439 |b 5 |e Corresponding author |
| 773 | _ | _ | |a 10.5194/gmd-18-4273-2025 |g Vol. 18, no. 13, p. 4273 - 4291 |0 PERI:(DE-600)2456725-5 |n 13 |p 4273 - 4291 |t Geoscientific model development |v 18 |y 2025 |x 1991-959X |
| 856 | 4 | _ | |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/1044264/files/Invoice_Helmholtz-PUC-2025-87.pdf |
| 856 | 4 | _ | |y OpenAccess |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/1044264/files/gmd-18-4273-2025.pdf |
| 909 | C | O | |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:1044264 |p openaire |p open_access |p OpenAPC |p driver |p VDB |p openCost |p dnbdelivery |
| 910 | 1 | _ | |a Forschungszentrum Jülich |0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8 |k FZJ |b 0 |6 P:(DE-Juel1)179383 |
| 910 | 1 | _ | |a Forschungszentrum Jülich |0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8 |k FZJ |b 1 |6 P:(DE-Juel1)164446 |
| 910 | 1 | _ | |a Forschungszentrum Jülich |0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8 |k FZJ |b 3 |6 P:(DE-Juel1)173788 |
| 910 | 1 | _ | |a Forschungszentrum Jülich |0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8 |k FZJ |b 5 |6 P:(DE-Juel1)167439 |
| 913 | 1 | _ | |a DE-HGF |b Forschungsbereich Erde und Umwelt |l Erde im Wandel – Unsere Zukunft nachhaltig gestalten |1 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-210 |0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-211 |3 G:(DE-HGF)POF4 |2 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-200 |4 G:(DE-HGF)POF |v Die Atmosphäre im globalen Wandel |9 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-2111 |x 0 |
| 914 | 1 | _ | |y 2025 |
| 915 | p | c | |a APC keys set |0 PC:(DE-HGF)0000 |2 APC |
| 915 | p | c | |a Local Funding |0 PC:(DE-HGF)0001 |2 APC |
| 915 | p | c | |a DFG OA Publikationskosten |0 PC:(DE-HGF)0002 |2 APC |
| 915 | p | c | |a DOAJ Journal |0 PC:(DE-HGF)0003 |2 APC |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200 |2 StatID |b SCOPUS |d 2024-12-21 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0160 |2 StatID |b Essential Science Indicators |d 2024-12-21 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a Creative Commons Attribution CC BY 4.0 |0 LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBY4 |2 HGFVOC |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0600 |2 StatID |b Ebsco Academic Search |d 2024-12-21 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1150 |2 StatID |b Current Contents - Physical, Chemical and Earth Sciences |d 2024-12-21 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0501 |2 StatID |b DOAJ Seal |d 2022-12-20T09:29:04Z |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0500 |2 StatID |b DOAJ |d 2022-12-20T09:29:04Z |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a WoS |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0113 |2 StatID |b Science Citation Index Expanded |d 2024-12-21 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a Fees |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0700 |2 StatID |d 2024-12-21 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150 |2 StatID |b Web of Science Core Collection |d 2024-12-21 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a OpenAccess |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0510 |2 StatID |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a Peer Review |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0030 |2 StatID |b ASC |d 2024-12-21 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a Article Processing Charges |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0561 |2 StatID |d 2024-12-21 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300 |2 StatID |b Medline |d 2024-12-21 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199 |2 StatID |b Clarivate Analytics Master Journal List |d 2024-12-21 |
| 920 | _ | _ | |l yes |
| 920 | 1 | _ | |0 I:(DE-Juel1)ICE-3-20101013 |k ICE-3 |l Troposphäre |x 0 |
| 980 | _ | _ | |a journal |
| 980 | _ | _ | |a VDB |
| 980 | _ | _ | |a UNRESTRICTED |
| 980 | _ | _ | |a I:(DE-Juel1)ICE-3-20101013 |
| 980 | _ | _ | |a APC |
| 980 | 1 | _ | |a APC |
| 980 | 1 | _ | |a FullTexts |
| Library | Collection | CLSMajor | CLSMinor | Language | Author |
|---|