001     1044377
005     20250722202240.0
024 7 _ |a 10.34734/FZJ-2025-03152
|2 datacite_doi
037 _ _ |a FZJ-2025-03152
041 _ _ |a English
100 1 _ |a Kuhles, Gianna
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)187476
|b 0
|e Corresponding author
111 2 _ |a 43. European Workshop on Cognitive Neuropsychology
|g EWCN
|c Bressanone
|d 2025-01-26 - 2025-01-30
|w Italy
245 _ _ |a Prediction of depression in Parkinson’s disease by prosodic speech features
260 _ _ |c 2025
336 7 _ |a Conference Paper
|0 33
|2 EndNote
336 7 _ |a INPROCEEDINGS
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a conferenceObject
|2 DRIVER
336 7 _ |a CONFERENCE_POSTER
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Conference Poster
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Poster
|b poster
|m poster
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)24
|s 1753188576_25565
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
|x After Call
500 _ _ |a This study was supported by▪ the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, GE 2835/2–1, EI 816/16-1 and EI 816/21-1),▪ the National Institute of Mental Health (R01-MH074457),▪ the Helmholtz Portfolio Theme "Supercomputing and Modeling for the HumanBrain",▪ the Virtual Brain Cloud (EU H2020, no. 826421) &▪ the National Institute on Aging (R01AG067103)
520 _ _ |a Introduction: Parkinson’s disease (PD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disease whichmainly affects functions of the motor system. Depressive disorders (DD) are one of the mostcommon comorbidities in PD (Perez-Toro et al., 2022) and often lead to a decrease in qualityof life (Balestrino & Martinez-Martin, 2017). Previous research revealed a strong relationshipbetween prosodic impairment and DD (Vélez Feijó et al., 2008) which is why recent studieshave investigated whether speech parameters might be suitable as biomarkers for the predictionof depression in PD. However, the variability in feature extraction tools and methodologies hasleft the most predictive prosodic parameters inadequately defined (Perez-Toro et al., 2022). Inour study, we aim to address this gap by identifying reliable, standardised features for predictingdepression in PD.Methods: Healthy subjects (n = 249) and people with PD (n = 121) performed a spontaneousspeech task of 90 s duration. 88 acoustic features related to prosodic functions wereautomatically extracted from these speech samples using the toolbox OpenSMILE. Participantsalso completed the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II) to assess depressive symptoms.Prosodic features were used to classify between healthy subjects and people with PD.Additionally, a machine learning regression approach was employed to predict individual BDI-II scores from prosodic speech features and to determine the most significant predictors.Results: Firstly, the classification analysis demonstrated a high level of accuracy (0.997) indistinguishing between healthy subjects and individuals with PD based on the prosodic features.Secondly, the regression analysis revealed an R2 value of 0.024, indicating limited predictivepower for BDI-II scores derived from prosodic features. However, consistent with priorresearch, spectral parameters emerged as the most significant predictors, especially the MelFrequency Cepstral Coefficients, which describe the perceived pitch of the frequency spectrum.Discussion: Although the model demonstrated satisfactory performance in classifying betweenhealthy individuals and those with Parkinson's disease, the rather low accuracy in predictingdepressive disorders (DD) highlights the complexity of using prosodic features for this purpose.While present results need to be validated in larger and diverse samples, they pave the way tothe development of uniform methodologies for the systematic extraction of speech-relatedbiomarkers in PD, which in the long run might have clinical utility for better understanding DDin people with PD.Pérez-Toro PA et al. Speech Commun. (2022) 145:10-20.Balestrino R & Martinez-Martin P J. Neurol. Sci. (2017) 374: 3-8.Vélez Feijó A et al. Neuro. Dis. Treat. (2008) 4:669-674.
536 _ _ |a 5251 - Multilevel Brain Organization and Variability (POF4-525)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5251
|c POF4-525
|f POF IV
|x 0
700 1 _ |a Thies, Tabea
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 1
700 1 _ |a Barbe, Michael
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 2
700 1 _ |a Eickhoff, Simon
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)131678
|b 3
700 1 _ |a Camilleri, Julia
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)172024
|b 4
700 1 _ |a Weis, Susanne
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)172811
|b 5
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/1044377/files/Poster.pdf
|y OpenAccess
909 C O |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:1044377
|p openaire
|p open_access
|p VDB
|p driver
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 0
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)187476
910 1 _ |a HHU Düsseldorf
|0 I:(DE-HGF)0
|b 0
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)187476
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 3
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)131678
910 1 _ |a HHU Düsseldorf
|0 I:(DE-HGF)0
|b 3
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)131678
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 4
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)172024
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 5
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)172811
910 1 _ |a HHU Düsseldorf
|0 I:(DE-HGF)0
|b 5
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)172811
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|b Key Technologies
|l Natural, Artificial and Cognitive Information Processing
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-520
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-525
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF4
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-500
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|v Decoding Brain Organization and Dysfunction
|9 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5251
|x 0
914 1 _ |y 2025
915 _ _ |a OpenAccess
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0510
|2 StatID
920 _ _ |l yes
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)INM-7-20090406
|k INM-7
|l Gehirn & Verhalten
|x 0
980 _ _ |a poster
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)INM-7-20090406
980 1 _ |a FullTexts


LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21