% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Hoheisel:1044797,
author = {Hoheisel, Linnea and Hacker, Hannah and Fink, Gereon R and
Daun, Silvia and Kambeitz, Joseph},
title = {{C}omputational modelling reveals neurobiological
contributions to static and dynamic functional connectivity
patterns},
journal = {Frontiers in computational neuroscience},
volume = {19},
issn = {1662-5188},
address = {Lausanne},
publisher = {Frontiers Research Foundation},
reportid = {FZJ-2025-03353},
pages = {1525785},
year = {2025},
abstract = {Functional connectivity (FC) is a widely used indicator of
brain function in health and disease, yet its
neurobiological underpinnings still need to be firmly
established. Recent advances in computational modelling
allow us to investigate the relationship of both static FC
(sFC) and dynamic FC (dFC) with neurobiology
non-invasively.In this study, we modelled the brain activity
of 200 healthy individuals based on empirical resting-state
functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and diffusion
tensor imaging (DTI) data. Simulations were conducted using
a group-averaged structural connectome and four parameters
guiding global integration and local excitation-inhibition
balance: (i) G, a global coupling scaling parameter; (ii)
Ji, an inhibitory coupling parameter; (iii) JN, the
excitatory NMDA synaptic coupling parameter; and (iv) wp,
the excitatory population recurrence weight. For each
individual, we optimised the parameters to replicate
empirical sFC and temporal correlation (TC). We analysed
associations between brain-wide sFC and TC features with
optimal model parameters and fits with a univariate
correlation approach and multivariate prediction models. In
addition, we used a group-average perturbation approach to
investigate the effect of coupling in each region on overall
network connectivity.Our models could replicate empirical
sFC and TC but not the FC variance or node cohesion (NC).
Both fits and parameters exhibited strong associations with
brain connectivity. G correlated positively and JN
negatively with a range of static and dynamic FC features
(|r| > 0.2, pFDR < 0.05). TC fit correlated negatively, and
sFC fit positively with static and dynamic FC features. TC
features were predictive of TC fit, sFC features of sFC fit
(R2 > 0.5). Perturbation analysis revealed that the sFC fit
was most impacted by coupling changes in the left
paracentral gyrus (Δr = 0.07), TC fit by alterations in the
left pars triangularis (Δr = 0.24).Our findings indicate
that neurobiological characteristics are associated with
individual variability in sFC and dFC, and that sFC and dFC
are shaped by small sets of distinct regions. By modelling
both sFC and dFC, we provide new evidence of the role of
neurophysiological characteristics in establishing brain
network configurations.},
cin = {INM-3},
ddc = {610},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)INM-3-20090406},
pnm = {5252 - Brain Dysfunction and Plasticity (POF4-525) / DFG
project G:(GEPRIS)491111487 - Open-Access-Publikationskosten
/ 2025 - 2027 / Forschungszentrum Jülich (OAPKFZJ)
(491111487)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5252 / G:(GEPRIS)491111487},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
doi = {10.3389/fncom.2025.1525785},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/1044797},
}