% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Frahm:1045526,
author = {Frahm, Lennart and Patil, Kaustubh R. and Satterthwaite,
Theodore D. and Fox, Peter T. and Eickhoff, Simon B. and
Langner, Robert},
title = {{P}redictive modeling of significance thresholding in
activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis},
journal = {Imaging neuroscience},
volume = {3},
issn = {2837-6056},
address = {Cambridge, MA},
publisher = {MIT Press},
reportid = {FZJ-2025-03531},
pages = {$imag_a_00423$},
year = {2025},
note = {This study was supported by the Deutsche
Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, EI 816/11-1 and International
Research Training Group 2150, 269953372/GRK2150), the
National Institute of Mental Health (R01-MH074457), the
National Institute of Aging (P30-AG066546), and the
Jülich-Aachen Research Alliance (JARA) granting computation
time on the supercomputer JURECA (Jülich Supercomputing
Centre, 2018) at Forschungszentrum Jülich. Open access
funding is enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.},
abstract = {Activation Likelihood Estimation (ALE) employs voxel- or
cluster-level family-wise error (vFWE or cFWE) correction or
threshold-free cluster enhancement (TFCE) to counter false
positives due to multiple comparisons. These corrections
utilize Monte-Carlo simulations to approximate a null
distribution of spatial convergence, which allows for the
determination of a corrected significance threshold. The
simulations may take many hours depending on the dataset and
the hardware used to run the computations. In this study, we
aimed to replace the time-consuming Monte-Carlo simulation
procedure with an instantaneous machine-learning prediction
based on features of the meta-analysis dataset. These
features were created from the number of experiments in the
dataset, the number of subjects per experiment, and the
number of foci reported per experiment. We simulated 68,100
training datasets, containing between 10 and 150 experiments
and computed the vFWE, cFWE, and TFCE significance
thresholds. We then used this data to train one XGBoost
regression model for each thresholding technique. Lastly, we
validated the performance of the three models using 11
independent real-life datasets (21 contrasts) from
previously published ALE meta-analyses. The vFWE model
reached near-perfect prediction levels (R² = 0.996), while
the TFCE and cFWE models achieved very good prediction
accuracies of R² = 0.951 and R² = 0.938, respectively.
This means that, on average, the difference between
predicted and standard (monte-carlo based) cFWE thresholds
was less than two voxels. Given that our model predicts
significance thresholds in ALE meta-analyses with very high
accuracy, we advocate our efficient prediction approach as a
replacement for the currently used Monte-Carlo simulations
in future ALE analyses. This will save hours of computation
time and reduce energy consumption. Furthermore, the reduced
compute time allows for easier implementation of
multi-analysis set-ups like leave-one-out sensitivity
analysis or subsampling.},
cin = {INM-7},
ddc = {610},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)INM-7-20090406},
pnm = {5251 - Multilevel Brain Organization and Variability
(POF4-525)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5251},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {40800822},
UT = {WOS:001521329000001},
doi = {10.1162/imag_a_00423},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/1045526},
}