% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Muganga:1045701,
author = {Muganga, Tobias and Sasse, Leonard and Larabi, Daouia and
Nieto, Nicolás and Caspers, Julian and Eickhoff, Simon B.
and Patil, Kaustubh R.},
title = {{V}oxel‐{W}ise or {R}egion‐{W}ise {N}uisance
{R}egression for {F}unctional {C}onnectivity {A}nalyses:
{D}oes {I}t {M}atter?},
journal = {Human brain mapping},
volume = {46},
number = {12},
issn = {1065-9471},
address = {New York, NY},
publisher = {Wiley-Liss},
reportid = {FZJ-2025-03561},
pages = {e70323},
year = {2025},
abstract = {Removal of nuisance signals (such as motion) from the BOLD
time series is an important aspect of preprocessing to
obtain meaningful resting-state functional connectivity
(rs-FC). The nuisance signals are commonly removed using
denoising procedures at the finest resolution, that is the
voxel time series. Typically, the voxel-wise time series are
then aggregated into predefined regions or parcels to obtain
an rs-FC matrix as the correlation between pairs of regional
time series. Computational efficiency can be improved by
denoising the aggregated regional time series instead of the
voxel time series. However, a comprehensive comparison of
the effects of denoising on these two resolutions is
missing. In this study, we systematically investigate the
effects of denoising at different time series resolutions
(voxel-level and region-level) in 370 unrelated subjects
from the HCP-YA dataset. Alongside the time series
resolution, we considered additional factors such as
aggregation method (Mean and first eigenvariate [EV]) and
parcellation granularity (100, 400, and 1000 regions). To
assess the effect of those choices on the utility of the
resulting whole-brain rs-FC, we evaluated the individual
specificity (fingerprinting) and the capacity to predict age
and three cognitive scores. Our findings show generally
equal or better performance for region-level denoising with
notable differences depending on the aggregation method.
Using Mean aggregation yielded equal individual specificity
and prediction performance for voxel-level and region-level
denoising. When EV was employed for aggregation, the
individual specificity of voxel-level denoising was reduced
compared to region-level denoising. Increasing parcellation
granularity generally improved individual specificity. For
the prediction of age and cognitive test scores, only fluid
intelligence indicated worse performance for voxel-level
denoising in the case of aggregating with the EV. Based on
these results, we recommend the adoption of region-level
denoising for brain-behavior investigations when using Mean
aggregation. This approach offers equal individual
specificity and prediction capacity with reduced
computational resources for the analysis of rs-FC patterns.},
cin = {INM-7},
ddc = {610},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)INM-7-20090406},
pnm = {5252 - Brain Dysfunction and Plasticity (POF4-525) / JL
SMHB - Joint Lab Supercomputing and Modeling for the Human
Brain (JL SMHB-2021-2027)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5252 / G:(DE-Juel1)JL SMHB-2021-2027},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
doi = {10.1002/hbm.70323},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/1045701},
}